Governing ambiguity and implementing cross-sectoral programmes: urban regeneration for social mix in Paris

Boisseuil, Clément

doi:10.1007/s10901-019-09644-4

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These two conditions remain vague and give room to interpretative dispute during policy implementation. In other words, this ambiguity opens the door to implementation conflicts (i.e., Boisseuil, 2019). In addition, as this is an exceptional authorization system (as opposed to an automatic license system), fulfilling these two conditions does not automatically grant a right to an authorization.…”

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The focus on mono‐professional policy settings is not always relevant, since many policies require the collaboration of bureaucrats from various policy sectors and of different professional backgrounds. Furthermore, the more ambiguous and discretion‐oriented a policy is, the higher are the chances of implementation conflicts among bureaucrats (Boisseuil, 2019, p. 438). Literature on policy coordination has better taken into account the importance of inter‐group dynamics, highlighting that opposition among different groups of public servants during enforcement can hamper the outcome of policy implementation networks and complicate their management in interjurisdictional policy settings (Bland, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship and morality politics: Dividing lines within the state

Mavrot

2022

European J Political Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on a qualitative and quantitative research design, this article examines the implementation of a morality policy-the medical cannabis policy in Switzerland-to investigate three understudied aspects of bureaucratic entrepreneurship. First, moving away from mono-professional studies, the focus is on a policy characterized by a dispute between two groups of bureaucrats: physicians and jurists. Second, key conditions triggering bureaucratic policy entrepreneurship are identified, with a focus on mid-level administrative entrepreneurs. Third, vertical alliances between bureaucrats and politicians of the executive and legislative branches are examined and these processes are reflected in the wider perspective of the politics-administration dichotomy. Results show that law obsolescence, disputes between groups of bureaucrats and the need for political arbitration are favorable conditions for bureaucratic policy entrepreneurship. The study also shows that within the traditional separation of powers, bureaucratic entrepreneurship reinforces the executive power and creates dividing lines within the different branches of government.

show abstract

Section: Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship and morality politics: Dividing lines within the state

Mavrot

2022

European J Political Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lo que convierte a la ambigüedad en un elemento inherente a los ambientes caóticos y cambiantes, por tanto, las acciones que la mitigan es el uso de la claridad, la coherencia en la comunicación y las expresiones emocionales facilitando estratégicamente alcanzar los objetivos, conservar el equilibrio del poder en el liderazgo y actuar eficazmente ante los retos. De manera que, las ambigüedades o información divergentes se soluciona mediante el consenso de perspectivas, actitudes que contrarrestan las incertidumbres y gestión de las diferencias para disminuir riesgos cuando se presentan (Deschamps, 2019;Boisseuil, 2019;Berger y Bosetti, 2020;Ptaszynski, Masui y Ishii, 2019;Engemann y Scott, 2018;kim et al, 2019;Beauchene et al, 2018), de ahí que, los líderes y/o gerentes que dirigen procesos o situaciones que suceden en el entorno laboral; deben poseer competencias tales como la flexibilidad, la adaptación, la gestión y la objetividad para responder de forma exitosa a los desafíos. De igual manera, deben tener un equipo que trabaje efectivamente en el entorno, fortalezca sus habilidades, tome decisiones y comprenda los procesos que se gestan al interior de las organizaciones (Lund, 2019).…”

Section: Ambigüedad En Las Organizacionesunclassified

“…et al (2018),Oesch (2017);Boisseuil (2019),Buckley (2020),Lund (2019),Mitchell et al (2020),Riis, Hellström y Wikstrom (2019),Altug et al, (2020),Breese et al,(2019), Guillemin, (2020, De Toni y Pessot, (2020), Hasan, He y Lu (2020), Islam (2020), Kovacic y Di Felice (2019), Manders, Wieczorek y Verbong (2020), Plagerson, et al, (2019),Bahadorestani et al, (2020), Bao, Diabat y Zheng (2019), Beauchêne et. al, (2018), Deschamps (2019), Ho, Ghauri y kafouros (2019), Hsieh, Ma y Novoselov (2018), Kim, et al, (2019), Belissa, Lensink y Asseldonk, (2019), Berger y Bosetti, (2020), Brancucci et la, (2020), Chitre, Tian y Vishnu (2019), Cho y Taylor (2019), Ptaszynski et al, (2019), Ruan y Zhang (2020), Seow, Pan y Koh (2018), Walker, Davis y Stevenson, (2016), Hussinger y Pacher (2018), Pelletier, et al, (2018), Song, Park y Kim (2020).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

ambigüedad y su afectación en las organizaciones. Una revisión de literatura.

Abril

Valencia

García

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La ambigüedad se desarrolla en ambientes organizacionales confusos que requiere de líderes y/o gerentes que implementen metodologías, estrategias, competencias y habilidades que promueva buenas relaciones laborales, aumento en la productividad y sostenibilidad en el mercado. Este artículo propone revisar sistemáticamente la literatura sobre la ambiguedad en las organizaciones y su impacto en desarrollo social. Evidenciando, que este entorno se puede desarrollar en cualquier contexto, no tiene técnicas o estrategias establecidas; pero si es necesario, que las personas encargadas tengan liderazgo, tomen decisiones acertadas, gestionen las situaciones ambiguas y sean creativos e innovadores ante las situaciones emergentes. Esta investigación concluye que en contextos caóticos donde se presenta continuamente situaciones de ambigüedad, es vital que los lideres de procesos organizacionales cuenten con habilidades blandas y duras que le permitan afrontar de forma efectiva las condiciones del contexto y mitigar los riesgos psicosociales.

show abstract

“…In 2015, the law was reinforced requiring all municipalities to provide a separate housing provision programme that sets out the housing needs within the municipality and the comprehensive measures for accommodating such needs (Granath Hansson 2019). Since the housing provision act calls upon municipalities to work in a more integrated fashion across sectors, areas of expertise and responsibilities (Boisseuil 2019;cf. Healey 2006;Schmitt and Wiechmann 2018), it has contributed to opening up 'new' planning spaces in-between the more formal ones within the municipalities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizing cross-sectoral housing provision planning: settings, problems and knowledge

Berglund-Snodgrass

Högström

Fjellfeldt

et al. 2020

European Planning Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the governance of housing provision, the public sector is considered unable efficiently to manage such problems through the traditional bureaucratic organizations and associated governing tools. Instead, municipalities are expected to engage in collaborative processes across sectors and with external stakeholders, with the overarching objective to deliver more efficient planning outcomes. As the processes are carried out across sectors, it opens up the opportunity to privilege certain sectors' perspectives and marginalize others. By drawing from Mouffe's agonistic political theories, this article makes an empirical account of the political in organizing cross-sectoral collaborative planning in Swedish municipalities, with the empirical example of developing municipal programmes for housing provision. The article concludes that social service is severely marginalized in what is generally a depoliticized housing provision planning process. Underpinning the collaboration is the conceptualizing of housing provision as primarily a general deficit in constructing housing. Primarily organizing objectivist knowledge, housing provision is constructed as a technical and procedural matter rather than ideological and political. Through such organizing principles, the overarching housing provision problem remains undealt with, e.g. how do we provide housing to 'all' our citizens? ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Governing ambiguity and implementing cross-sectoral programmes: urban regeneration for social mix in Paris

Cited by 10 publications

References 44 publications

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship and morality politics: Dividing lines within the state

Bureaucratic entrepreneurship and morality politics: Dividing lines within the state

ambigüedad y su afectación en las organizaciones. Una revisión de literatura.

Organizing cross-sectoral housing provision planning: settings, problems and knowledge

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About