1984
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-198403000-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goniometric Reliability in a Clinical Setting. Elbow and Knee Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
158
3
13

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
158
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The arms of the goniometer should be aligned, with the proximal arm along the midline of the fibula, the fulcrum by the lateral malleoli and the distal arm parallel to the fifth metatarsal (Norkin and White, 1985). Regular goniometric range of motion evaluations have been shown to be reliable, with intra-tester reliability being higher than inter-tester reliability (Boone et al, 1978, Rothstein et al, 1983. HaglundÅkerlind and Eriksson (1993) used ankle range of motion in an hydraulic isokinetic dynamometer to obtain a more objective measure of muscle flexibility.…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arms of the goniometer should be aligned, with the proximal arm along the midline of the fibula, the fulcrum by the lateral malleoli and the distal arm parallel to the fifth metatarsal (Norkin and White, 1985). Regular goniometric range of motion evaluations have been shown to be reliable, with intra-tester reliability being higher than inter-tester reliability (Boone et al, 1978, Rothstein et al, 1983. HaglundÅkerlind and Eriksson (1993) used ankle range of motion in an hydraulic isokinetic dynamometer to obtain a more objective measure of muscle flexibility.…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Knee joint ROM of the test leg was quantified using an 18-inch flexible and adjustable plastic goniometer (Baseline TM , Diagnostic and Measuring Instruments) that is commonly employed by healthcare practitioners working in a clinical setting. 8 All measurements were made according to visibly identifiable anatomical landmarks, and avoided procedures that would require examiners to estimate the exact center of rotation about which the knee joint moves. Pilot testing demonstrated that the greater trochanter of the femur (hip), head of the fibula (knee), and lateral malleolus of the fibula (ankle) were the most readily identifiable landmarks of the region.…”
Section: Data Collection Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its widespread use in orthopedics, the reliability of goniometric assessment (continuous data) has been rigorously investigated. [6][7][8][9] Clinicians also utilize pass/ fail (or negative/positive) scoring systems (dichotomous data) to assess ROM about a particular joint. These orthopedic tests (sometimes referred to as ''special tests'') help to determine whether a particular type of dysfunction (i.e., impingement syndrome, agonist/antagonist imbalance in muscle strength or flexibility, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um outro aspecto importante da aferição goniométrica é a conϐiabilidade da medida intra-avaliador, que representa a habilidade de um único avaliador obter resultados consistentes em mensurações sucessivas, e a inter-avaliador, que representa a concordância entre medidas da mesma articulação por diferentes avaliadores (Rothstein et al 1983, Gajdosik & Bohannon 1987, Norkin & White 1997, Hayes et al 2001, Araújo et al 2009. No presente estudo a mensurações com menor conϐiabilidade foram as do avaliador 2, em especial no carpo e cotovelo, provavelmente por ser o avaliador menos experiente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified