This research was designed to evaluate musculoskeletal anatomy of the quadriceps region relative to the patellofemoral joint. The hypothesis for the study was that the oblique portion (VMO) of the vastus medialis muscle (VM) is anatomically positioned to function primarily as an active medial stabilizer of the patella. Because many clinicians believe that the VMO functions independently as an active medial stabilizer of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ), PFJ rehabilitation protocols commonly target the VMO in an attempt to restore normal joint mechanics. It is unclear whether this purported selective function is supported by the underlying anatomical structure. Through dissection of 32 limbs from 24 intact cadavers with normal patellar alignment, data were collected on VM fiber alignment and innervation, the presence of fascial plane, and the length of VM about the patella. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the oblique and long heads of the VM muscle had significantly different (P < 0.05) angles of fiber orientation, as expected. When measurements were taken relative to a vertical axis (standardizing limb alignment between cadavers), the difference in fiber angles between oblique and long heads of the VM was reduced significantly. Additionally, < 10% of the length of the VM muscle inserted directly on the medial aspect of the patella, and there was no anatomical evidence of a fascial plane or separate innervation for the oblique and long heads of the VM. The results of the study did not support the hypothesis that the VMO is anatomically positioned to function primarily as an active medial stabilizer of the patella.

In sports medicine, unreliable or inaccurate clinical examination confounds the clinician's ability to make informed decisions regarding appropriate patient referral and treatment interventions. Our results indicate that levels of accuracy and reliability for clinical examination of the ACL within a multidisciplinary sports medicine setting may be much lower than previously reported within the literature. Further research is needed to clarify whether a standardized approach to ACL clinical examination could enhance levels of accuracy and reliability among clinicians working in a multidisciplinary setting.

Background:The modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) and Y-Balance Test (YBT) are two common methods for clinical assessment of dynamic balance. Clinicians often use only one of these test methods and one outcome factor when screening for lower extremity injury risk. Dynamic balance scores are known to vary by age, sex and sport. The physically active adolescent female is at high risk for sustaining lower extremity injuries, specifically to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Thus clarity regarding the use of dynamic balance testing results in adolescent females is important. To date, no studies have directly compared the various outcome factors between these two dynamic balance tests for this population.Purpose: To determine if there was an association between the mSEBT and YBT scores for measured reach distances, calculated composite score and side-to-side limb asymmetry in the ANT direction in physically active healthy adolescent females. Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Methods: Twenty-five healthy, physically active female adolescents (mean age, 14.0 ± 1.3 years) participated. Reach distances, a composite score and side-to-side limb asymmetry for the mSEBT and YBT, for each limb, were compared and examined for correlation.Results: There were significant differences and moderate to excellent relationships between the measured reach directions between the mSEBT and the YBT. Injury risk classification, based on limb asymmetry in the anterior reach direction, differed between the tests. However, the calculated composite scores from the two tests did not differ. Conclusions:Performance scores on a particular reach direction should not be used interchangeably between the mSEBT and YBT in physically active adolescent females, and should not be compared to previously reported values for other populations. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

No abstract