2018 16th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Telecommunications (ITST) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/itst.2018.8566771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS Localization Propagation Error Estimation Considering Environmental Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the error sources mentioned above are almost constant and can be equalized by available mitigation models. However, k e is the error factor associated with k th satellite due to working environment that is random and unpredictable in nature and has the most severe effects on GNSS position estimation [38]. The error due to environment alone can be can be modelled as…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the error sources mentioned above are almost constant and can be equalized by available mitigation models. However, k e is the error factor associated with k th satellite due to working environment that is random and unpredictable in nature and has the most severe effects on GNSS position estimation [38]. The error due to environment alone can be can be modelled as…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, there are studies proposing to use of different additional sensors to detect the environmental obstacle and obtain which satellite signals should be blocked from these obstacles and which signals should reach the receiver directly. Tang [11] used a fisheye camera and projection of the satellite position to obtain visibility of the satellite. Using the information on which satellite is blocked could be determined, and a User Equivalent Range Error (UERE) calculation was proposed to predict the positioning error with the Horizontal Dilution of Precision (HDOP) estimation approach.…”
Section: B Additional Sensor-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of the water vapor changes in accordance with the weather condition, in such conditions the modeling becomes difficult. Also, a dry atmosphere causes a delay [30]- [32].…”
Section: Signal Propagation Modeling Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the satellite gets to the lower levels of the atmosphere, the power signal reduces, and hence the multipath error tends to increase, which can be controlled with high-end receivers. User range error is the square root of the sum of squares of the range error of control segment, atmospheric propagation, and receiver noise and multipath [30], [36].…”
Section: Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%