2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucoamylase production by solid-state fermentation using rice flake manufacturing waste products as substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Glucoamylase activity was determined in a reaction mixture containing 1 ml of enzyme solution appropriately diluted in McIlvaine's buffer with 1 ml of aqueous suspension of 1% starch at 50°C for 10 min (Anto et al, 2006). In these enzymes test the reaction was terminated by adding 1 ml of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent and heating in boiling water bath for 10 min.…”
Section: Enzyme Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucoamylase activity was determined in a reaction mixture containing 1 ml of enzyme solution appropriately diluted in McIlvaine's buffer with 1 ml of aqueous suspension of 1% starch at 50°C for 10 min (Anto et al, 2006). In these enzymes test the reaction was terminated by adding 1 ml of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent and heating in boiling water bath for 10 min.…”
Section: Enzyme Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of glucoamylase (GA) is performed mostly by two methods, Solid State or Solid-Substrate Fermentation (SSF) and Submerged Fermentation (SMF) [5]. SSF has many advantages over SMF, such as simple technique, superior productivity, low capital investment, low energy requirement and less water output, better product recovery and lack of foam build up and reported to be the most appropriate process for developing countries [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although glucoamylases have been produced by submerged fermentation traditionally, solid state fermentation (SSF) processes have been increasingly applied for the production of this enzyme in recent years (Ellaiah et al, 2002). SSF has advantages over submerged fermentation in that it is simpler, requires less capital, has superior productivity, lower energy requirement, requires simpler fermentation media, does not require rigorous control of fermentation parameters, uses less water, produces less waste water, allows for the easy control of bacterial contamination, and has a lower downstream processing cost (Ellaiah et al, 2002;Anto et al, 2006;Melikoglu et al, 2013a). However, the scale up of the SSF is a great challenge due to hardship of mixing, difficulty of heat removal and restricted water content which cause rapid change of moisture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%