1988
DOI: 10.1002/bit.260310802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucoamylase immobilized on acid‐hydrolyzed starch graft polyacrylonitrile

Abstract: A continuous stirred reactor fed maltose as substrate was used to show that acid hydrolyzed starch-g-polyacry-lonitrile and other polysaccharide graft copolymers can bind and retain significant quantities of active glucoamy-lase. Glucose productivities up to 2.7 g/g carrier/h were observed with the immobilized glucoamylase, and half-lives up to 1800 h were indicative of activity longevity. Factors influencing the immobilized enzyme activity and first-order decay rate included temperature, p(H), and carrier com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carboxymethyl high amylose starch cross‐linked 35 (CM‐HASCL‐35) is suitable as carrier for immobilization of uricase 6. Acid hydrolyzed starch‐g‐polyacrylonitrile copolymers can bind and retain significant quantities of active glucoamylase 7. Glucose productivities up to 2.7 g/g carrier/hour were observed with the immobilized glucoamylase, and half‐lives up to 1800 h were indicative of activity longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carboxymethyl high amylose starch cross‐linked 35 (CM‐HASCL‐35) is suitable as carrier for immobilization of uricase 6. Acid hydrolyzed starch‐g‐polyacrylonitrile copolymers can bind and retain significant quantities of active glucoamylase 7. Glucose productivities up to 2.7 g/g carrier/hour were observed with the immobilized glucoamylase, and half‐lives up to 1800 h were indicative of activity longevity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the immobilization of these enzymes is being intensively investigated (e.g. Vallat, 1983;Krakoviak et al, 1984;Ohtsuka et al, 1984;Kennedy et al, 1985;Szajani et al, 1985;Slininger et al, 1988), the scale-up of these processes is not economical except when used to obtain relatively high priced products. It is not there-fore worthwhile to extend them to impure substrates or those in low concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%