2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset

Abstract: We describe the Northern Hemisphere terrestrial snow water equivalent (SWE) time series covering 1979–2018, containing daily, monthly and monthly bias-corrected SWE estimates. The GlobSnow v3.0 SWE dataset combines satellite-based passive microwave radiometer data (Nimbus-7 SMMR, DMSP SSM/I and DMSP SSMIS) with ground based synoptic snow depth observations using bayesian data assimilation, incorporating the HUT Snow Emission model. The original GlobSnow SWE retrieval methodology has been further developed and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The monthly mean values from 1979 to 2019 of several atmospheric variables such as geopotential height, surface air temperature, sea level pressure (SLP), snow fall, and snow depth are studied with a focus on the boreal winter season (i.e., December-January-February). Version 4 of the Northern Hemisphere EASE-Grid 2.0 snow cover (Brodzik and Armstrong 2013) used in this study is obtained from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (http:// nsidc.org/data/) with the original weekly data at a grid cell size of 25 km × 25 km, which has been converted to monthly mean with 1 × 1 spatial resolution, and the newly released GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset for the period of 1979-2018 is also used (Luojus et al, 2021). The AO, East Atlantic/Western Russia (EA/WR), and Polar/Eurasia (POLEUR) teleconnection indices are provided by the Climate Prediction Center (CPC).…”
Section: Data Method and Coupled Model Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monthly mean values from 1979 to 2019 of several atmospheric variables such as geopotential height, surface air temperature, sea level pressure (SLP), snow fall, and snow depth are studied with a focus on the boreal winter season (i.e., December-January-February). Version 4 of the Northern Hemisphere EASE-Grid 2.0 snow cover (Brodzik and Armstrong 2013) used in this study is obtained from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (http:// nsidc.org/data/) with the original weekly data at a grid cell size of 25 km × 25 km, which has been converted to monthly mean with 1 × 1 spatial resolution, and the newly released GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset for the period of 1979-2018 is also used (Luojus et al, 2021). The AO, East Atlantic/Western Russia (EA/WR), and Polar/Eurasia (POLEUR) teleconnection indices are provided by the Climate Prediction Center (CPC).…”
Section: Data Method and Coupled Model Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the robust sample Mahalanobis distance (RMD) (Leys et al, 2018) to identify spurious SWE-SD data pairs as in Hill et al (2019). The RMD method is based on the traditional Mahalanobis distance (MD) (Mahalanobis, 1930), which is the distance of a point from the mean of a multivariate distribution. It relies on the mean and covariance matrices of the multivariate distribution, which are affected by outliers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PF-CLM-EU3km simulated higher SWE across the domain, which is particularly noticeable in north eastern Europe. However, it has been shown that GlobSnow-3 data tends to underestimate SWE in the northern hemisphere (Luojus et al, 2021), so the overestimation in PF-CLM-EU3km may not be as large as this comparison suggests. Overall, the PF-CLM-EU3km northern Europe streamflow performance results agree with previous pan-European studies which showed that most hydrological models perform worse in northeastern Europe, primarily due to forcing data errors and/or a coarse topographic resolution of these models that misrepresent the effects of topography on snow dynamics in these regions (Gudmundsson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Streamflow Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The GlobSnow SWE dataset is developed through a data assimilation approach by combining the ground-based synoptic snow depth stations with satellite passive microwave radiometer data and using the HUT snow emission model (Takala et al, 2011). Compared to previous versions of GlobSnow, Luojus et al (2021) further improved this dataset through bias-correction of monthly SWE data using the snow-course SWE measurements, independent from the snow depth data used in the assimilation. For comparison with model simulated SWE, we interpolated the bias-corrected monthly time series of SWE from 25 km to 3 km resolution using the first-order conservative interpolation method (Jones, 1999).…”
Section: Snow Water Equivalent Datamentioning
confidence: 99%