Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on High Performance Computing (Cat. No. 98EX238)
DOI: 10.1109/hipc.1998.737987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global reactive congestion control in multicomputer networks

Abstract: In this paper we develop a general approach to global reactive congestion control in multicomputer networks. The approach uses timeout mechanism to detect congestion, and exploits control lines such as those used for handshaking in the flit-level flow control of wormhole routers to distribute information about congestion. It is also based on a mechanism that limits the demands placed by the network interface and the processing element. The approach is described in detail and evaluated through simulation experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, these solutions address multi-computer networks, in which the design considerations are significantly different from those of NoCs. For example, some works modify the network routers in order to throttle packet injection at high loads (e.g., [13], [14]), discard packets (e.g., [15]), deflect packets away from loaded locations (e.g. [16], [17]), use separate buffers for traffic destined at a hot-module (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these solutions address multi-computer networks, in which the design considerations are significantly different from those of NoCs. For example, some works modify the network routers in order to throttle packet injection at high loads (e.g., [13], [14]), discard packets (e.g., [15]), deflect packets away from loaded locations (e.g. [16], [17]), use separate buffers for traffic destined at a hot-module (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes a sudden, severe drop in throughput and corresponding increase in packet latency. Several proposed schemes prevent the performance degradation that accompanies saturation by throttling packet injection when saturation is imminent [1,16,20,25,30]. Our approach goes further as it increases the applied load at which saturation occurs and avoids throughput degradation at saturation without placing limits on packet injection beyond those imposed by simple back-pressure.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anjan and Pinkston [25] have shown that eager misrouting can hurt performance for uniform traffic. As such, we want a lazy misrouting strategy that postpones misrouting until it is either hurting performance because of packets stalling behind it or because misrouting is mandated by the packet exchange protocol to avoid deadlocks in adaptive channels.…”
Section: Misroutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense, many HOL blocking elimination strategies have been proposed: Virtual Output Queues (VOQs) [31], Dynamically Allocated Multiqueues (DAMQs) [32], congestion buers [33], etc.…”
Section: Congestion Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%