2008
DOI: 10.1080/13658810801949827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS‐based multicriteria spatial modeling generic framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Outranking methods are a type of MCDA methods that are well suited to land suitability assessment and to deal with spatial decision problems since they: (i) permit to consider qualitative evaluation criteria (in addition to quantitative ones) for which preference intervals ratios have no sense; (ii) permit to consider evaluation criteria with heterogeneous scales such that coding them into one common scale would be very difficult or artificial; (iii) avoid the complete compensation between evaluation criteria; and (iv) require a fewer amount of information from the decision maker [36]. But it is also recognized that these methods are subject to computational limitations with respect to the number of decision alternatives [37].…”
Section: Outranking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outranking methods are a type of MCDA methods that are well suited to land suitability assessment and to deal with spatial decision problems since they: (i) permit to consider qualitative evaluation criteria (in addition to quantitative ones) for which preference intervals ratios have no sense; (ii) permit to consider evaluation criteria with heterogeneous scales such that coding them into one common scale would be very difficult or artificial; (iii) avoid the complete compensation between evaluation criteria; and (iv) require a fewer amount of information from the decision maker [36]. But it is also recognized that these methods are subject to computational limitations with respect to the number of decision alternatives [37].…”
Section: Outranking Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some intrinsic methodological characteristics of the different approaches play a crucial role in determining their suitability to be integrated with spatial analysis: (i) alternativebased methods, in which the different options are directly compared against each other, easily reach their computational limits in a spatial context as every pixel of the map becomes an alternative (Chakhar and Mousseau, 2008); (ii) there is a need for coherence between the standardization of the maps and the axiomatic foundations of the methods; (iii) there is a limited availability of built-in MCA methods in GIS software; and (iv) there is a need to avoid the black-box effect, by having simplified elicitation protocols and ensuring the transparency of the model.…”
Section: Challenge 2: What Is the Appropriate Mca Method?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are criticisms regarding the use of raster data (see e.g. Marinoni, 2006), but their use also presents advantages (see Chakhar & Mousseau, 2008), notably through the overlay approach. Our aim was therefore to use a raster data model in order to integrate the relevant criteria and RS for decision making in public safety.…”
Section: Spatial Multi-criteria Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%