2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting Institutions “Right” for Whom? Credit Constraints and the Impact of Property Rights on the Quantity and Composition of Investment

Abstract: Property rights reform is typically hypothesized to boost investment through investment demand and credit supply effects. Yet when the credit supply effect is muted, property rights reform would be expected to induce liquidity-constrained farms to reduce investment in movable capital even as they increase investment in attached capital. This expectation is corroborated by econometric analysis of panel data from Paraguay. While all farmers experience a positive investment demand effect, liquidity-constrained pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
159
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
159
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These arguments have led to several investigations into the secure property rights and access to credit relationship. Yet most of such studies in Africa and other parts of the developing world have failed to establish a clear link between secure property rights and access to funding (Brown et al, 2006;Carter and Olinto, 2003;Galeana, 2004;Gilbert, 2002;Petracco, and Pender, 2009;Place, and Migot-Adholla, 1998). That notwithstanding, the argument continuous to gain popularity amongst various governments and development partners leading to the massive rollout of various property rights registration programmes around the 6 developing world.…”
Section: Soto In His Book the Mystery Of Capital: Why Capitalism Trimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arguments have led to several investigations into the secure property rights and access to credit relationship. Yet most of such studies in Africa and other parts of the developing world have failed to establish a clear link between secure property rights and access to funding (Brown et al, 2006;Carter and Olinto, 2003;Galeana, 2004;Gilbert, 2002;Petracco, and Pender, 2009;Place, and Migot-Adholla, 1998). That notwithstanding, the argument continuous to gain popularity amongst various governments and development partners leading to the massive rollout of various property rights registration programmes around the 6 developing world.…”
Section: Soto In His Book the Mystery Of Capital: Why Capitalism Trimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may accrue only to wealthy producers (Carter and Olinto 2003) and often expectations for property rights reform to improve credit access failed to materialize (Field and Torero 2006). One reason is that better access to information on land ownership will affect credit supply only if other impediments are absent, i.e., if agents have been credit constrained before and are endowed with sufficient levels of illiquid wealth that can be foreclosed upon at reasonable cost (Besley and Ghatak 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While credit advantages of land titling have been reported in the literature (Feder et al 1998), positive impacts have often been limited to larger land owners (Mushinski 1999;Carter and Olinto 2003), and some studies failed to find credit effects even where they were expected Fort 2007). Even if profitable projects exist, legal restrictions on land sales (Sundet 2004), limited commercial value of the land (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2005;Payne et al 2008), and social or political considerations that limit foreclosure may jeopardize realization of credit effects.…”
Section: Environment For Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%