1972
DOI: 10.1063/1.1654228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gettering rates of various fast-diffusing metal impurities at ion-damaged layers on silicon

Abstract: High-temperature gettering of Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Au by ion-damaged surface layers on silicon wafers has been studied by Rutherford backscattering of 4He+ ions incident at 1.75 or 2 MeV. Analysis showed impurity levels in the damaged layers ranging from 1013–1017/cm2. The metals fall into two groups: those which are gettered slowly-Fe, Co, and Au— and those gettered rapidly-Cu and Ni. This trend is predicted by a simple diffusion model using published interstitial solubilities and diffusivities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…113,114 Impurities such as Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Au were shown to be gettered by a variety of implanted species. More recently, channeled and high energy Si self-implantation has been examined in more detail for its gettering properties.…”
Section: Implantation Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…113,114 Impurities such as Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, and Au were shown to be gettered by a variety of implanted species. More recently, channeled and high energy Si self-implantation has been examined in more detail for its gettering properties.…”
Section: Implantation Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…113,114 Although various groups have explored implantation as an extrinsic gettering technique, 113-119 such studies have not been exhaustive. In light of current processing trends, several inherent advantages of ion implantation have led to interest in re-examining this approach.…”
Section: Impurity Getteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 PTEM was therefore conducted to determine whether the microstructural differences were, in part, responsible for the differences in sheet resistance observed. Figure 4 indicates the PTEM images of the extended defects in the flash annealed control samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first publication in the field of ion beam gettering in 1972 [9] and the first application in 1973 [2] the new gettering method has developed into an effective technological procedure. The advantages of the ion beato gette~ing compared to other methods are (i) the high reproducibility of the damage conditions by the precise adjustment of dose, energy, temperature, and ion species; (ii) the application of ions which become electrically inactive atoms inside the crystal; (Jii) the high-vacuum conditions of the process; (ir) damage production through planar layers; (v) gettering by the implanted ions themselves, and (vi) lower annealing temperatures in comparison with glass gettering.…”
Section: Ion Beam Getteringmentioning
confidence: 99%