1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(98)00041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geothermal characteristics of the Vorotilovo deep borehole drilled into the Puchezh-Katunk impact structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations performed in recent years at the Vorotilovo scientific deep well drilled in the Puchezh‐Katunk impact structure, Russia [ Popov et al , 1998], and at the Nördlingen‐1973 scientific well drilled in the Ries impact structure, Germany [ Popov et al , 2003a], demonstrated (1) low thermal anisotropy of rocks (brecciated, cataclased, thermally overprinted and shock transformed target rocks) and (2) low values of thermal conductivity, density and velocity in the rocks affected by the shock and postshock thermal conditions [ Schmitt et al , 2007] in comparison with similar rocks outside these impact structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Investigations performed in recent years at the Vorotilovo scientific deep well drilled in the Puchezh‐Katunk impact structure, Russia [ Popov et al , 1998], and at the Nördlingen‐1973 scientific well drilled in the Ries impact structure, Germany [ Popov et al , 2003a], demonstrated (1) low thermal anisotropy of rocks (brecciated, cataclased, thermally overprinted and shock transformed target rocks) and (2) low values of thermal conductivity, density and velocity in the rocks affected by the shock and postshock thermal conditions [ Schmitt et al , 2007] in comparison with similar rocks outside these impact structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peculiarities may be typical of impact structures in general and can be caused by mechanical damage and the shock‐induced thermal metamorphism of rocks [e.g., Popov et al , 1998, 2003a; Vermeesch and Morgan , 2004]. Nevertheless, this question can only be answered by taking into account the lithology of the impact structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1990s, the optical scanning technique [15] was widely applied to measurements of rock thermal conductivity, which has advantages such as high work efficiency, non contact manner, direct measurements on rock-cores (no need to make samples) and being able to estimate anisotropy and inhomogeneity of rocks. So far the successful cases of its utility includes the Vorotilovo deep borehole at the East Europe platform [28] , deep borehole at the Kola peninsula of Russia [29] , and deep borehole at the Sulu-Dabie area of China [30] .…”
Section: Measurement Methods Of Rock Thermal Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain information on changes of vertical variations of the conductive component of heat flow density due to the impact, uniquely combined petrophysical and geothermal investigations have been carried out by our group on four impact structures: the Puchezh–Katunki impact structure (Vorotilovo borehole, Russia; Popov et al. ), the Ries impact structure (the Noerdlingen‐73 borehole, Germany; Popov et al. ), the Chicxulub structure (the Yaxcopoil‐1 borehole, Mexico; Popov et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…); the rock anisotropy was taken into account at these measurements (Popov et al. , , , ; Mayr et al. , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%