2007
DOI: 10.1029/175gm04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical structure of the Southern Alps Orogen, South Island, New Zealand

Abstract: The central part of the South Island of New Zealand is a product of the transpressive continental collision of the Pacific and Australian plates during the past 5 million years, prior to which the plate boundary was largely transcurrent for over 10 My.Subduction occurs at the north (west dipping) and south (east dipping) of South Island. The deformation is largely accommodated by the ramping up of the Pacific plate over the Australian plate and near-symmetric mantle shortening. The initial asymmetric crustal d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate is based on the few available P‐T estimates in exposed Alpine Schist (Grapes & Watanabe, , ; Grapes, ; Vry et al, ) and seismic data, both of which indicate that the hanging wall passes through depths of 35–40 km. This depth lies above the seismically imaged, ~45 km thick crustal root of the Southern Alps (Davey et al, ) (Figure c). Kinematic modeling of low‐temperature thermochronologic data predicts that a listric décollement might sole out at ~35 km depth (Herman et al, ) (Figure c).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This estimate is based on the few available P‐T estimates in exposed Alpine Schist (Grapes & Watanabe, , ; Grapes, ; Vry et al, ) and seismic data, both of which indicate that the hanging wall passes through depths of 35–40 km. This depth lies above the seismically imaged, ~45 km thick crustal root of the Southern Alps (Davey et al, ) (Figure c). Kinematic modeling of low‐temperature thermochronologic data predicts that a listric décollement might sole out at ~35 km depth (Herman et al, ) (Figure c).…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Major faults in the central Southern Alps have predominantly dip‐slip motion yet they strike NNE around 30° oblique to the plate boundary (BBF, HRF, MF and LF in Figure 11). Their strike is more closely oriented to the axis of anomalous gravity and seismic velocity, which is 10–20° oblique to the plate boundary, hinting that faulting may be in part controlled by, or responsible for, thickening of Pacific plate material and/or potentially mantle lithosphere deformation (Figure 1e) [ Davey et al , 2007; Ellis et al , 2006; Gerbault et al , 2002, 2003]. The fault motion matches shortening within a duplex structure in semischist rocks (DUP in Figures 6a, 7, and 11) [ Cox et al , 1997].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps of the South Island of New Zealand showing (a) digital terrain model of topography; (b) mean annual rainfall, modeled for the period 1971–2000 [ Tait et al , 2006]; (c) glacial geology and preserved Cretaceous‐Tertiary erosion surface [ Cox and Sutherland , 2007] with extent of ice at the last glacial maximum (white) [ Barrell , 2011] and active faults with known evidence for rupture in the past 120,000 years (GNS Science, Active faults database 2011, from http://data.gns.cri.nz/af/); (d) erosion, calculated as a mean ground lowering from a suspended sediment yield model [ Hicks et al , 1996], assuming an average crustal density of 2.65 t/m 3 ; (e) shallow (<40 km) seismicity for 1964–2011, overlain on Bouguer gravity and showing area of anomalously high seismic velocity (Vp = 6.5 km/s contour) [ Davey et al , 2007]; and (f) maximum rates of contemporary shear strain derived by GPS surveys between 1996 and 2008 (updated from Beavan et al [2007]) together with Pacific‐Australian plate vectors calculated at Fox Glacier [ Beavan et al , 2007; DeMets et al , 1994, 2010] and central Alpine Fault late Quaternary slip rates [ Norris and Cooper , 2001]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crustal structure beneath the Southern Alps, particularly along the SIGHT 1 and 2 lines (see location in Figure a), is well resolved from seismic studies, including tomography and gravity (Figure a) [ Scherwath et al ., , Van Avendonk et al ., , Davey et al ., ; Stern et al ., ; Eberhart‐Philips et al ., ; Boese et al ., ].…”
Section: Geometry Of the Alpine Fault Beneath The Southern Alpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleoseimicity studies show that the entire length of the Alpine Fault is capable of rupturing during M7.6 to 8+ events [ Sutherland et al ., ], but the locked zone, capable of earthquake rupture, has been interpreted to extend to a maximum depth of only ∼10 km, with aseismic free slip below this. This is because the heat flow is high near the fault due to the high‐erosion rate, reaching 190 mWm −2 near Fox Glacier, with a geothermal gradient >60°C/km [ Davey et al ., ; Beavan et al ., ; Toy et al ., ; Sutherland et al ., 2013], and there is a ∼10 km cutoff of microseismicity (Figure a) [ Boese et al ., ].…”
Section: Geometry Of the Alpine Fault Beneath The Southern Alpsmentioning
confidence: 99%