2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-021-01171-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide diversity and structure variation among lablab [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] accessions and their implication in a Forage breeding program

Abstract: Most orphan crops have not been fully sequenced, hence we rely on genome sequences of related species to align markers to different chromosomes. This hinders their utilisation in plant population improvement programs. Utilising the advances in the science of sequencing technologies, the population structure, relatedness, and genetic diversity among accessions can be assessed quickly for better exploitation in forage breeding programs. Using DArTseq technology, we studied the genetic and structural variation in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5) which is a much higher SNP density than that reported for lablab recently (one GBS-based SNP markers per ca. 100Kb) [19, 28]. Despite the high number of genome-wide SNP markers identified in the present study, the rate of unique SNPs identified decays with half of the genotyped accessions (Fig 2) which implies possible duplications in our panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 5) which is a much higher SNP density than that reported for lablab recently (one GBS-based SNP markers per ca. 100Kb) [19, 28]. Despite the high number of genome-wide SNP markers identified in the present study, the rate of unique SNPs identified decays with half of the genotyped accessions (Fig 2) which implies possible duplications in our panel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Exploring the crop's genetic potential by collecting appropriate germplasm and understanding its diversity status, using genomic tools in combination with phenotyping, is a key approach to fast-track breeding efforts and accelerate the crop's full domestication [19,22,23]. Recently, some agronomic studies have shed light on seed maturity, yield, feed quality traits and intercropping capabilities of lablab [24][25][26][27] but there have been few studies on genetic variability and population dynamics [28][29][30][31]. For fast-tracking improvement plans, integrated approaches such as phenotyping, genotyping and phenotype-genotype association studies should be carried out and developing genomic tools is an integral part of this endeavor [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profiling of 25,039 DNA markers (9320 DArT SNPs and 15,719 SilicoDart) data on 65 lablab bean germplasm showed low discriminating ability and three subpopulations unrelated to site of origin. High within population variance suggests a greater degree of gene exchange or low genetic differentiation among the populations (Sserumaga et al, 2021). Another data set involving 1,000 SNP and SilicoDArT markers data on 142 lablab accessions unfolded five major groups, each with further subgroups (Muktar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Morpho-agronomic Traits-based Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their steps of advancement, the first group of markers, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), was employed to understand the diversity and genetic characterization. The second group, namely, sequence‐based markers including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), microsatellite or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), and expressed sequence tags (ESTs), was utilized in mapping studies (Dholakia et al, 2019; Kamotho et al, 2016; Keerthi et al, 2018; Kimani et al, 2012; Konduri et al, 2000; Rai et al, 2018a; Sserumaga et al, 2021; Vaijayanthi et al, 2018). Despite their applications in Lablab, there has been little utilization of these markers to improve drought tolerance.…”
Section: Drought Tolerance In Lablabmentioning
confidence: 99%