1970
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.87842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics of red pine

Abstract: The authors noted, however, that few of the New York populations appeared to be expanding. Morton and Bedell (11)60) suggested that many stands are edaphic or pyric relics. The current natural range was depicted in detail by Critchfield and Little (1966). The commercial range was outlined by Rudolf (1957). These distributions are combined in figure-2. Rock outcrops, lacustrine clays, and windblown 'Research Scientist, Canada Dep. of Fisheries and Forestry, Frederietou, X.is. 'Associate Professor. Dep. of Fores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies has shown that there is some morphological variation in red pine, but it is much less than that for almost all other conifers studied. Among populations, generally ≈ 10% of morphological variation is determined genetically by source population, as determined in provenance tests (common garden experiments) (Fowler & Lester 1970; Wright et al . 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies has shown that there is some morphological variation in red pine, but it is much less than that for almost all other conifers studied. Among populations, generally ≈ 10% of morphological variation is determined genetically by source population, as determined in provenance tests (common garden experiments) (Fowler & Lester 1970; Wright et al . 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces propriétés biologiques permettent de prédire 30 à 40% des niveaux de diversité intrapopulation (Hamrick et al, 1992;Hamrick et Godt, 1990 (Ledig, 1988). Des résultats similaires ont été obtenus en Europe pour le hêtre (Comps et al, 1991) et le chêne sessile (Kremer et al, 1991 (Mosseler et al, 1991;Fowler and Lester, 1970 (Comps et al, 1987;Comps et al, 1990). Chez l'épicéa, Bergmann (1978) (Wright, 1976 (Arbez, 1994 …”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Observations of low genetic diversity in red pine have also been corroborated at higher levels of genetic resolution using random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (Mosseler et al 1992a). Red pine appears to be genetically depauperate at biochemically detectable loci and for quantitative variation (Rudolf 1957;Fowler and Lester 1970), but mutations at genes controlling morphological traits such as branch angle have been observed (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Population Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…isolated stands that result in a highly fragmented population structure. The patchiness of red pine populations is probably related to its highly specialized ecological/edaphic requirements, and its early successional position related to fire (Fowler and Lester 1970). Red pine has an ephemereal position on dry, coarse-textured soils where it can compete effectively with the more dominant species of the Boreal, Acadian, and Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forest ecoregions (Rowe 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%