1994
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19940708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversité génétique et variabilité des caractères phénotypiques chez les arbres forestiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to those generally obtained for temperate forest tree species (Hamrick et a!., 1992;Kremer, 1994). The main difference between our study and others is that we defined a 'population' to consist of trees coming from the same geographical region.…”
Section: Geographical Differentiation In Ulmus Minorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This result is similar to those generally obtained for temperate forest tree species (Hamrick et a!., 1992;Kremer, 1994). The main difference between our study and others is that we defined a 'population' to consist of trees coming from the same geographical region.…”
Section: Geographical Differentiation In Ulmus Minorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For widespread species distributed over large latitudinal or continental ranges, clear geographical clinal trends of variation have usually been found and important population differences have been observed that were attributed to environmental selection pressures. On the other hand, allozyme population surveys in widespread forest species have resulted in extremely low population differentiation (Hamrick et al, 1992;Kremer, 1994), although geographical patterns have been detected (Lagercrantz & Ryman, 1990) when rangewide studies were conducted. In contrast to phenotypic traits, geographical trends of variation in ailozyme frequencies have been attributed to evolutionary footprints (Strauss et a!., 1992), particularly recolonization routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allelic richness is considered to be the most relevant criterion when studying population diversity [8,15,21]; some authors considered the preservation of alleles more important than the maintenance of allelic frequencies. So, for example, the Greek population showed the lower level of polymorphism (70.83%) but it is possible to detect a strong contribution to allelic richness in this population, since higher values for both measures have been obtained in other cases (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%