2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-018-2324-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity among common bean cultivars based on agronomic traits and molecular markers and application to recommendation of parent lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the carioca commercial class, the complexity is even greater since any change in the ideotype leads to a devaluation of the grain on the market. For that reason, Brazilian common bean breeding programs usually prefer crosses among elite carioca cultivars, due to the additive effects of quantitative traits, obtaining superior advanced bean lines [ 64 , 99 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of the carioca commercial class, the complexity is even greater since any change in the ideotype leads to a devaluation of the grain on the market. For that reason, Brazilian common bean breeding programs usually prefer crosses among elite carioca cultivars, due to the additive effects of quantitative traits, obtaining superior advanced bean lines [ 64 , 99 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that as a result of the limitation of the operational capacity of breeding programs, the right choice of parents for genetic improvement is extremely important [ 64 , 69 , 100 ]. Some authors have reported the possibility of selecting superior parents based only on genotypic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the current advances in molecular markers, a number of studies have been conducted to assess genetic diversity, population structure, and genome-wide association in the common bean. A wide range of molecular markers, including restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs; Velasquez and Gepts, 1994;Freyre et al, 1998), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Beebe et al, 2000;Durán et al, 2005), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs; González et al, 2005;Dagnew et al, 2014), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs; Beebe et al, 2001;Papa and Gepts, 2003), simple sequence repeats (SSRs; Blair et al, 2007Blair et al, , 2009Blair et al, , 2010aAsfaw et al, 2009;Kwak and Gepts, 2009;Burle et al, 2010;McClean et al, 2012;De La Fuente et al, 2013;Mercati et al, 2013;Okii et al, 2014Okii et al, , 2017Gioia et al, 2019;Pereira et al, 2019), and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; Cortés et al, 2011;Blair et al, 2013;Goretti et al, 2013;Cichy et al, 2015a;Rodriguez et al, 2016;Lobaton et al, 2018;Raatz et al, 2019), have been used in common bean.…”
Section: Population Structure and Genome-wide Association Analysis Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet this demand, common beans are grown throughout the all year under different cultivation systems and with different technological levels (Heinemann et al, 2016). In general, Brazilian consumers prefer the Mesoamerican carioca (cream seed coat with brown stripes) and black beans, which represent around 70 and 15% of total common bean production, respectively (Pereira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%