2006
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.8.1971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Control of Conventional Labeling through the Bovine Meat Production Chain by Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Real-Time PCR

Abstract: Since January 2002, the European Union has adopted precise guidelines aimed at protecting the safety of meat and controlling the production chain. To this purpose, the conventional traceability of livestock and meat represents the main tool, but verification of traceability requires genetic support. At present, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) represent the most innovative molecular markers in genotyping studies. The aim of this study was to verify correct labeling in a bovine meat production chain by a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies of cattle genomic diversity mainly focused on the analysis of sparse data from microsatellite markers [6], [7], [8], [2], [9], [10], [11]. More recently, studies that evaluated bovine population structure have used Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) [12], [13], [14], [15]; however they focused on a small number of markers. The advent of modern high-throughput technologies is starting to produce genomewide data for thousands of markers across the bovine genome [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies of cattle genomic diversity mainly focused on the analysis of sparse data from microsatellite markers [6], [7], [8], [2], [9], [10], [11]. More recently, studies that evaluated bovine population structure have used Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) [12], [13], [14], [15]; however they focused on a small number of markers. The advent of modern high-throughput technologies is starting to produce genomewide data for thousands of markers across the bovine genome [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study used DNA traceability to indicate that 2% of randomly selected samples from labelled carcases at the abattoir did not match the profiles of the animals they were purported to come from. This increased to 3% when sampling was conducted at the point of sale [12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, traceability is essential to avoid fraud. But in some occasions, conventional tracing techniques are susceptible to error through the loss of correspondence between a registration number and the related animal (Aung & Chang, 2014;Capoferri et al, 2006). It is therefore necessary to develop new methods of traceability that are not susceptible to any type of manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent article, Zhao et al (2019) developed a PCR-capillary electrophoresis method based on the analysis of 12 SNPs for genetic traceability in China large-size beef company and distinguish individuals with a matching probability of 1.70 × 10 -5 . Similarly, Capoferri et al (2006) developed a method for genetic control of conventional beef labeling based in the analysis of 12 selected SNPs by real-time PCR. In this study, the probability that two random individuals presented the same genotype was 7.67 10 -5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%