2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-004-3192-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of debris in the femtosecond laser machining of a silicon substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6.37 Â 10 À 4 and 7.64 Â 10 À 3 J/mm 2 ), except for the removal of few materials. A small amount of ablated debris scattered around the irradiated areas, which originated from the atoms and clusters due to the Coulomb explosion [27]. With increasing laser fluence, cylindrical holes were observed, with bottom completely covered with "pine cortex" heaves.…”
Section: The Blind Holes (Or Circular Surfaces)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6.37 Â 10 À 4 and 7.64 Â 10 À 3 J/mm 2 ), except for the removal of few materials. A small amount of ablated debris scattered around the irradiated areas, which originated from the atoms and clusters due to the Coulomb explosion [27]. With increasing laser fluence, cylindrical holes were observed, with bottom completely covered with "pine cortex" heaves.…”
Section: The Blind Holes (Or Circular Surfaces)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, redeposition in powder form along the cut was observed. Work by Matsumura et al [26] compared femtosecond laser machining of a silicon substrate in gas environment (Ar, He and N 2 ) and in vacuum. They reported that the machining process also produced a significant amount of debris in the gas environment whereas no debris were found in vacuum.…”
Section: Approach In Preventing Recast and Debris Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem however is that during laser patterning graphene forms folds [27] and debris causing disturbance resulting in unwanted defects and negative impact on its application as transistor electrodes. Femtosecond laser ablation of graphene in vacuum, compared to air, should result in cleaner and more controlled patterning of the layer because rather less material is redeposited on the substrate [28][29][30]. Moreover, atmospheric oxygen can oxidize the remaining graphene upon laser ablation and reduce performance of graphenebased electronics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%