2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2017.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation control of a non-diffractive beam in random media by adjusting concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This central peak is not an Arago spot because the width and intensity are kept during its propagation after the optical cell 32 . As explained below, these central peaks are NDBs resulting from the constructive interference of beams scattering in the forward direction 29 , 30 . Figure 4 a shows the maximum NDBs generated at media concentrations of 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 5.0 and 22% with their corresponding propagation distances of 30, 20, 10, 5, and 3 cm in scattering media, respectively.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This central peak is not an Arago spot because the width and intensity are kept during its propagation after the optical cell 32 . As explained below, these central peaks are NDBs resulting from the constructive interference of beams scattering in the forward direction 29 , 30 . Figure 4 a shows the maximum NDBs generated at media concentrations of 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 5.0 and 22% with their corresponding propagation distances of 30, 20, 10, 5, and 3 cm in scattering media, respectively.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In those recent studies, the sensing detection limit of scattering media is up to a few millimeters in the viewpoint of microscopic imaging even though NDB is applied. To establish macroscopic sensing of scattering media such as living tissues, we focused on the propagation property of the annular beam in dense scattering media in our previous work 29 32 . The NDB was generated under the propagation of a few tens centimeters distance in the dense scattering media with a scattering coefficient of a few cm −1 , which is near to that of human tissues 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, the center part was subjected to stronger forward scattering at higher concentration in a short-distance random media. As a result, the non-diffracting field is offered the high center intensity in short distance [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of a non-diffracting beam (NDB), such as Bessel beam, it can propagate over a long distance and keep its narrow beam width, because it does not diffract (self-formation) [6][7][8]. In previous study, it has been confirmed that an annular beam could change its beam shape into quasi-NDB after being scattered several times in random media (10-30cm) [9]. But, variation of NDB in different receiving distance was not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, for the optical power meter, the sensor had a diameter of 1 centimeter hence a wide acceptance angle. The increased in concentration of scattering particles, increased the e ect of multiple scattering which caused the attenuation change of transmittance for 0.17% TiO 2 phantom (Almasian et al, 2015;Kholodnykh et al, 2003;Peng and Shiina, 2017;Shiina, 2017).…”
Section: Extinction Coe Cientmentioning
confidence: 99%