2005
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2003.024737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Psychiatric Disorders at Juvenile Probation Intake

Abstract: Among youths with conduct problems, girls demonstrated an elevated risk for co-occurring anxiety or affective disorder.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
171
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
19
171
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we support the idea of Klomek et al [5] , who have explained this gender difference by a gender paradox in which girls are more rarely bullies, but, when they are, they have more severe impairment than boys. This same phenomenon is seen in the findings of Wasserman et al [15] stating that girls who have conduct problems are at a higher risk of affective disorders than boys. Thirdly, the number of boys (208) in our sample is much smaller than the number of girls (300).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Secondly, we support the idea of Klomek et al [5] , who have explained this gender difference by a gender paradox in which girls are more rarely bullies, but, when they are, they have more severe impairment than boys. This same phenomenon is seen in the findings of Wasserman et al [15] stating that girls who have conduct problems are at a higher risk of affective disorders than boys. Thirdly, the number of boys (208) in our sample is much smaller than the number of girls (300).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…50 The sex differences in the association with bullying may be understood by a gender paradox. 51,52 Wasserman et al 53 found that female adolescents who demonstrate conduct problems are at higher risk of affective disorders than comparable males. Bullying behaviour could be another example of a gender paradox, 52,53 whereby the females are less likely to be bullies, but, when they are, they have a more severe impairment than their male counterparts.…”
Section: Bullying and Suicide In Cross-sectional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Wasserman et al of 991 adolescents under probation, 80% of the sample was male [20]. In a Northwestern Juvenile Project study involving 1829 male and female adolescents aged from 10 to 18 years at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center, approximately 90% of all detainees were males, a similar percentage as all child detainees in the U.S. [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%