Gender differences in pleasure: the mediating roles of cognitive flexibility and emotional expressivity

Abstract

Background Gender differences have been found to be associated with individuals’ pleasure. Cognitive flexibility and emotional expressivity might play an important role between gender differences and pleasure. This current study is to explore the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and emotional expressivity in the relationship between gender differences and pleasure. Method In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 1107 full-time university students from five colleges in Tianjin, Chinese mainland was investigated by questionnaire. All participants completed the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPs), the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI), and the Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ). Results The results of independent T-test suggested that females reported better emotional expressivity, anticipatory pleasure and consummatory pleasure than males, whereas males had better cognitive flexibility than females. Using bootstrapping approach revealed that the partially mediation effects of cognitive flexibility on gender differences in anticipatory and consummatory pleasure, and that of emotional expressivity on gender differences in anticipatory and consummatory pleasure. Results of this present study stated that cognitive flexibility and emotional expressivity play a partial mediating role in explaining gender differences in anticipatory and consummatory pleasure. Conclusion Females had higher anticipatory and consummatory pleasure because they tend to use emotional regulation strategy to express their emotion.

Examination of Perceived Stress and Cognitive Flexibility in Terms of Executive Functions in Young Athletes

“…Findings that are not similar to our study in the literature are given below; In a recent study, they stated that female students had higher scores than male students in terms of perceived stress (C. Wang, Zhang, Wiley, Fu, & Yan, 2022). In a different study conducted with university students, it was stated that the cognitive flexibility of boys was higher than that of girls and it was statistically (p<.05) significant (Altunkol, 2011).…”

Academic Self-efficacy and its Relationship to Academic Competitiveness, Academic Procrastination, and Cognitive Flexibility among Undergraduate Students

“…This finding is the same as that of Al-Saadi (2023) and Çelikkaleli (2014), who showed no differences in gender in cognitive flexibility. But differs from (Algharaibeh, 2020;Wang et al, 2022), which showed differences in cognitive flexibility in favor of males. This result can be explained due to the similarity of the academic and cultural conditions experienced by males and females, especially those who are affiliated with the same college and face situations and problems that may be related to their studies.…”

Adapting and Testing the Indonesian Version of the Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) Measuring Tool

“…The problem with item number 1 is also found in the Russian version of CFI (Kurginyan & Osavolyuk, 2018) and Iran (Shareh et al, 2014). In addition to the previously mentioned adaptations, CFI adapted into Japanese was also found to have 2 factors (in Oshiro et al, 2016), and CFI adapted into Chinese has also been indicated to have good fit (Wang et al, 2022).…”