2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and stress: Differential psychophysiological reactivity to stress reexposure in the laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(78 reference statements)
7
33
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…differences in coping with stress demonstrating that repeated exposure to stress causes women to be more vulnerable than men 32 , hence would mean that women assess their tinnitus related comorbidities more intensively than men. To buttress this, Vanneste et al 33 using continuous scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings and low-resolution electromyographic tomography (sLORETA) demonstrated differences in the activity of the prefrontal cortex between males and females in response to stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences in coping with stress demonstrating that repeated exposure to stress causes women to be more vulnerable than men 32 , hence would mean that women assess their tinnitus related comorbidities more intensively than men. To buttress this, Vanneste et al 33 using continuous scalp electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings and low-resolution electromyographic tomography (sLORETA) demonstrated differences in the activity of the prefrontal cortex between males and females in response to stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature suggests that there are gender differences in well-being and stress (Schmaus et al, 2008). Men and women also tend to have different coping strategies in dealing with burnout (Purvanova & Muros, 2010).…”
Section: A Gender Perspective On Resilience and Employees' Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it contributes to nascent literature that links stress and well-being to resilience by enriching the job demandsresources model with a gender perspective. The literature indicates male-female differences in well-being, for example, in stress (Schmaus, Laubmeier, Boquiren, Herzer, & Zakowski, 2008), and burnout, and accordingly in different coping mechanisms (Purvanova & Muros, 2010), and different determinants of job satisfaction (Huang & Gamble, 2015). Lack of clarity on the nature of gender differences in the face of such phenomena may generate ungrounded speculation that (mis)informs organisational decisions (Purvanova & Muros, 2010) and HRM policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stresses that women experience throughout their lives can adversely affect autonomic tone and heart function (Bonomi, Anderson, Rivara, & Thompson, 2007;Campbell et al, 2002;Eby, 2004;Eby, Campbell, Sullivan, & Davidson, 1995;Felitti et al, 1998;Goodwin & Stein, 2004;Heim et al, 2000;Rainville, Bechara, Naqvi, & Damasio, 2006;Schmaus, Laubmeier, Boquiren, Herzer, & Zakowski, 2008;Stemmler, Aue, & Wacker, 2007). Researchers postulate that stress may have a negative effect on the heart through autonomic stimulation (Cannon, 1939;Cohen & Benjamin, 2006;McEwen, 2005;Sharkey et al, 2005;Wittstein et al, 2005).…”
Section: Response Of Women's Hearts To Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%