2014
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2013.2297204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma and Proton-Induced Dark Current Degradation of 5T CMOS Pinned Photodiode $0.18~\mu\hbox{m}$ CMOS Image Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as regards the dark current uniformity, the dark current distributions were pretty uniform and no border effect was observed (contrary to what has been reported in [29]- [31]).…”
Section: Dark Current Increasecontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, as regards the dark current uniformity, the dark current distributions were pretty uniform and no border effect was observed (contrary to what has been reported in [29]- [31]).…”
Section: Dark Current Increasecontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…This is in good agreement with [6] which reports no difference between PPD CIS irradiated ON and those grounded during exposure. However, this is in clear contradiction with [14] 2 that demonstrates an effect of duty cycle on the dark current increase. There is no obvious explanation for these discrepancies and more data on more technologies and bias conditions would be needed to clarify this point.…”
Section: A Overview and Effect Of Bias During Irradiationcontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…The effect of TG OFF bias during irradiation has also been studied and no difference has been observed between the two tested conditions (in agreement with [6] but in contradiction with [14]). Contrary to what has been suggested in [6], the PPD capacitance is not influenced by the TID in the tested dose range and it is not the cause of the FWC reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the presence of a significant electric field, the deep trap level emits more charge carriers, so its generation rate increases. The influence of the electric field in the vicinity of a deep trap level has been described for the first time by J. Frenkel 7 and the electric field enhanced generation (EFEG) phenomena are often cited to explain high dark current events in image sensors 2,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13] . To our knowledge, except the paper from Bogaerts et al 10 which proposed a combination between a 1D and 3D EFEG model, the EFEG mechanisms are often described with a one dimensional approach 6,9,14 in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%