2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GaInP solar cells grown on Ge-on-Ge engineered substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detached GeON foils of a few mm 2 were reported in 2019 by Park et al 10 In 2020, 2.5 cm  2.5 cm detached areas were demonstrated by Courtois et al 11 Solar cells were fabricated in 2021 but only on non-detachable GeON surfaces. 17 The next step is upscaling beyond 100-and 150-mm-diameter wafers (the common wafer dimensions for the space PV industry), and for which two hurdles are faced. The first, practical, hurdle is that the Ge foil dimensions are limited by the lithography and dry-etch tool resolution, uniformity, and reproducibility.…”
Section: Upscaling the Foil Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Detached GeON foils of a few mm 2 were reported in 2019 by Park et al 10 In 2020, 2.5 cm  2.5 cm detached areas were demonstrated by Courtois et al 11 Solar cells were fabricated in 2021 but only on non-detachable GeON surfaces. 17 The next step is upscaling beyond 100-and 150-mm-diameter wafers (the common wafer dimensions for the space PV industry), and for which two hurdles are faced. The first, practical, hurdle is that the Ge foil dimensions are limited by the lithography and dry-etch tool resolution, uniformity, and reproducibility.…”
Section: Upscaling the Foil Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we demonstrated GaInP solar cells on GeON wafers, but not yet detached solar cells. 17 For this purpose, the foil must feature a density of pillars that appropriately trades off ease of detachment (i.e., weak enough to be compatible with standard F I G U R E 3 Top-view SEM images at the location of two crystal-originated pits (COP) of the evolution of the GeON surface along the process, from the starting blanket surface up to pore reorganization. Only the large COP prevented pore formation, but both eventually led to an interruption in the detachment layer, a pillar.…”
Section: Controlling Detachabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current industrial standard for substrate reuse, epitaxial lift-off (ELO), has achieved some degree of substrate reuse, but further cost reduction is limited by low throughput of the lateral etching step and the periodic need for repolishing [2,9]. Alternative strategies for device lift-off and subsequent substrate reuse include controlled spalling [10], laser lift-off [11], multiple ELO [12], porous substrates [13][14][15][16][17], and remote epitaxy [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the faceted surface presents a challenge for the direct use of spalled substrates for the growth of high-efficiency III-V solar cells, which have traditionally employed flat epilayers. Other work has investigated solar cells on non-pristine growth surfaces [9,15,16,[25][26][27][28], and has observed that some morphological spalling defects diminish cell performance [29,30]. However, the impact, if any, of these particular faceted GaAs surfaces on the quality of subsequently grown materials and devices is unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%