2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24666-1_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy vs. Likert Scale in Statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…the fuzzy number), rather than only one score, per each individual answer. Note that, in order to avoid this problem, when designing the questionnaire a fuzzy rating scale could be adopted [23,80,81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the fuzzy number), rather than only one score, per each individual answer. Note that, in order to avoid this problem, when designing the questionnaire a fuzzy rating scale could be adopted [23,80,81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A szakirodalmi áttekintésben bemutatott modellek -és az általunk bemutatott módszertan is -Likert-skála alkalmazására épül. A Likert-skálán alapuló értékelés öszszetett feladat: egyetlen értékelés során az értékelők több döntést hoznak -bizonytalansággal terhelt helyzetbenaz adott szempont szerinti értékelés során az értékelőnek viszonylag kevés érték közül kell választania (Gil & González-Rodríguez, 2012), így a pontos, precíz értékeléshez kapcsolódó szóródás, diverzitás és szubjektivitás elvész. Az alkalmazott statisztikai módszerek köre meglehetősen korlátozott, és az értékelés során releváns ismeretek veszhetnek el (Lubiano et al, 2016).…”
Section: További Módszertani Kérdések Kutatási Irányokunclassified
“…It is a discrete scale by choosing the most appropriate 'values' within a class according to the rater's judgement, opinion, valuation (Gil and González-Rodríguez, 2012) and lead to ordinal data from a set of pre-fixed categories. When Likert-type data are analysed for statistical purposes, the techniques to analyse them are quite limited (Lubiano et al, 2016).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likert-type scales have several weaknesses and do not ease the task of the rater (Jamieson, 2004;Carifio and Perla, 2007). The number of 'values' to choose from is small (Gil and González-Rodríguez, 2012) which means that the variability, diversity and subjectivity associated with an accurate rating is usually lost. Another disadvantage originates from the fact that when values are encoded by their relative position in accordance with a certain ranking, differences between codes cannot be interpreted as differences in their magnitude.…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation