2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Evaluating Intangible Resources Affecting Port Service Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3926/ic.956 Another important consideration is the fact that, of the 10 largest ports in the world, seven are Chinese, including the top four, which are the ports of Shanghai, Singapore, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. These ports were those most often used as study subjects, as can be seen in some st udies (Chou, Gou, Tsai, Tsou, Wong & Yu, 2010;Chou, 2010;Huang, Teng, Huang & Kou, 2003;Lin & Tseng, 2007;Murty, Liu, Wan & Linn, 2005;Pak, Thai & Yeo, 2015;Teng, Huang & Huang, 2004;Wu, Yan & Liu, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3926/ic.956 Another important consideration is the fact that, of the 10 largest ports in the world, seven are Chinese, including the top four, which are the ports of Shanghai, Singapore, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. These ports were those most often used as study subjects, as can be seen in some st udies (Chou, Gou, Tsai, Tsou, Wong & Yu, 2010;Chou, 2010;Huang, Teng, Huang & Kou, 2003;Lin & Tseng, 2007;Murty, Liu, Wan & Linn, 2005;Pak, Thai & Yeo, 2015;Teng, Huang & Huang, 2004;Wu, Yan & Liu, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This circumstance is contrary to theoretical positions. The studies focused on the strategic area made use of the following performance measurements: the existence of a future development plan (Chou, 2007;Chou et al, 2010;Chou, 2010;, planning ability, market analysis (Chou & Liang, 2001), investment plans, political/social and economic stability (Teng, Huang & Huang, 2004), the ability to develop services tailored to meet the needs of the different market segments (Schellinck & Brooks, 2014), and the continuous improvement of the management and political process, in order to reduce bureaucracy (Pak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature review, evaluation of service quality is regarded as a multi-attribute hierarchy structure problem. To solve this problem, MCDM techniques are suggested, such as using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and techniques to order preferences, similar to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) methodology used to evaluate the service quality of restaurants [32]; the Fuzzy AHP TOPSIS, used to estimate website service quality [33]; or the Fuzzy TOPSIS used to evaluate intangible resources that affect port service quality [34].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this fundamental yet powerful method is suitable for this pilot research. The linguistic variables [17] of the smart city project could be easily modelled by this MCDM technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%