2016
DOI: 10.1002/sec.1572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy certificateless signature

Abstract: According to the inspirations from history, we introduce a new cryptography primitive called fuzzy certificateless signature, which not only eliminates the key escrow problem inherently existed in fuzzy identity‐based signature but also possesses the error tolerance property of fuzzy identity‐based signature that allows for a set of attributes ω to verify a signature produced with a private key for an identity ω′ if and only if the distance between the two identities ω and ω′ is within a certain threshold. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we analyze the performance of our BioFIBS scheme and Bio-IBS scheme against the existing related schemes [5], [8]- [10], [12], [25] from the aspects of communicational efficiency (private key size and signature size) and computational efficiency (signing cost and verification cost). The results of comparison are shown in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.…”
Section: Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we analyze the performance of our BioFIBS scheme and Bio-IBS scheme against the existing related schemes [5], [8]- [10], [12], [25] from the aspects of communicational efficiency (private key size and signature size) and computational efficiency (signing cost and verification cost). The results of comparison are shown in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.…”
Section: Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed from Table 2 that the communicational cost of our Bio-IBS scheme is the lowest. We note that the size of the private key in [5], [8]- [10], [12], [25] and our BioFIBS scheme increases linearly with the length of the identity, so does the size of the signature, which directly results in such a fact that each of the same mathematical operations is repeated to generate the signature in the signing phase. Generally, biometric identity consists of attribute components (thus can be seen as a multi-identity as well) in a kind of identity-based signature schemes constructed by Lagrange polynomial whereas it is a single identity in those ones built by fuzzy extractor.…”
Section: Efficiency Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%