2014
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2013.2283237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Distribution Feeder Protection Using Directional Overcurrent Elements

Abstract: Distribution feeder protection could soon be complicated by nonradial flows of real and reactive power available from high penetration distributed generation and potentially from microgrids. Nondirectional overcurrent protection may not provide necessary security and sensitivity for faults on remote points of the circuit. Directional supervision is necessary to set overcurrent pickups with adequate sensitivity for remote faults. Setting the directional element by traditional means provides a reliability risk a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group proposes the modification of the existing protective philosophy by applying alternative conventional protective methodologies. Such methodologies are the voltage-based protection [82], the distance protection [83], the differential protection [84,85] and the directional overcurrent protection [86]. The second group approaches this problem differently, trying to mitigate the adverse behavior of the DRES in case of short-circuit faults, as for example by applying fault current limiters [87,88] and disconnecting the DRES [89,90].…”
Section: Frt Capability and Fault-clearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group proposes the modification of the existing protective philosophy by applying alternative conventional protective methodologies. Such methodologies are the voltage-based protection [82], the distance protection [83], the differential protection [84,85] and the directional overcurrent protection [86]. The second group approaches this problem differently, trying to mitigate the adverse behavior of the DRES in case of short-circuit faults, as for example by applying fault current limiters [87,88] and disconnecting the DRES [89,90].…”
Section: Frt Capability and Fault-clearingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Jones et al in [52] highlighted that traditional setting of the directional element will cause a reliability threat at various VAR flows depending on DG types. They demonstrated the drawbacks of NDOCR and the consequences of improper configuration for directional elements.…”
Section: Directional Overcurrent Relaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage is the false tripping impact at the upstream feeder end, which may occur when DG feeding faults on adjacent feeders which are using the NDOCR. Therefore, it is recommended that directional elements are featured in Jones et al in [52] highlighted that traditional setting of the directional element will cause a reliability threat at various VAR flows depending on DG types. They demonstrated the drawbacks of NDOCR and the consequences of improper configuration for directional elements.…”
Section: Directional Overcurrent Relaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e use of nondirectional overcurrent relays that operate regardless of the fault current direction leads to false tripping decisions due to the microgrid operations and the backfeed fault current from DGs [2]. Electromechanical and digital overcurrent relays equipped with directional components and a single relay setting have been developed to overcome the deficiency of faulty current detection [3]. Dual setting directional overcurrent relays (DOCRs) have been proposed in [4,5] to improve the capabilities of conventional DOCRs for protecting meshed distribution systems with DGs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%