2015
DOI: 10.1109/mgrs.2015.2434351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusing Landsat and MODIS Data for Vegetation Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landsat data are almost only available during the dry season, when vegetation and land surface in general have a significantly different appearance than during the rainy season. Previous studies indicated the importance of using Landsat input scenes that are temporally as close as possible to the prediction dates to minimize errors in the ESTARFM prediction [3,32]. Our results confirmed this assumption and additionally showed the value of Landsat input scenes from the same season and that abrupt events such as fires or floods between input and prediction date can decrease the accuracy.…”
Section: Added Value Of the Estarfm Framework For Cloud-prone Areassupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landsat data are almost only available during the dry season, when vegetation and land surface in general have a significantly different appearance than during the rainy season. Previous studies indicated the importance of using Landsat input scenes that are temporally as close as possible to the prediction dates to minimize errors in the ESTARFM prediction [3,32]. Our results confirmed this assumption and additionally showed the value of Landsat input scenes from the same season and that abrupt events such as fires or floods between input and prediction date can decrease the accuracy.…”
Section: Added Value Of the Estarfm Framework For Cloud-prone Areassupporting
confidence: 86%
“…First of all, the availability of Landsat input data has a great influence on the quality of the fusion. Minimizing the temporal distance of the shoulder pairs to the target scene is crucial for a successful prediction [3,32] and it became evident that using at least one shoulder pair from the same phenological stage as the prediction date has even higher positive influence (Figure 12).…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Prediction With Estarfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil tillage intensity maps for the South Fork watershed by year ([a, d] 2009, [b, e, g] 2010, and [c, f, h] (Gao et al 2010(Gao et al , 2015. The fused Landsat-MODIS images capture temporal variations possible with MODIS and show spatial details that can only be observed at Landsat spatial resolution.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hilker et al [8] proposed the STAARCH algorithm to use the tasseled cap transform of both Landsat's Thematic Mapper and Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (TM/ETM+) and MODIS reflectance data to identify spatial and temporal changes in the landscape with a high level of detail. Performance of these three methods was compared in [20]. Separately, Wu [9] proposed a spatiotemporal data fusion algorithm (STDFA) by mapping medium-resolution spatial images to extract fractional covers, using least square for fractional cover, and calculating surface reflectance using a surface reflectance calculation model.…”
Section: Methods Of Spatiotemporal Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%