2016
DOI: 10.3390/rs9010021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatiotemporal Fusion of Remote Sensing Images with Structural Sparsity and Semi-Coupled Dictionary Learning

Abstract: Fusion of remote sensing images with different spatial and temporal resolutions is highly needed by diverse earth observation applications. A small number of spatiotemporal fusion methods using sparse representation appear to be more promising than traditional linear mixture methods in reflecting abruptly changing terrestrial content. However, one of the main difficulties is that the results of sparse representation have reduced expressional accuracy; this is due in part to insufficient prior knowledge. For re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this method, the sparse representation is utilized to realize the super-resolution of fine temporal resolution images and a high-pass modulation is applied for fusion. Wei et al [23] included prior knowledge to increase the accuracy of the sparse representation-based method. This method builds a model containing semi-coupled dictionary learning and structural sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the sparse representation is utilized to realize the super-resolution of fine temporal resolution images and a high-pass modulation is applied for fusion. Wei et al [23] included prior knowledge to increase the accuracy of the sparse representation-based method. This method builds a model containing semi-coupled dictionary learning and structural sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the one-pair learning method was further developed to apply the SPSTFM method to the case of one known pair of fine and coarse images [27]. Since SPSTFM's assumption that the sparse coefficients across the fine and coarse image patches are the same is too strict, subsequent studies have been devoted to relaxing this assumption, such as the error-bound-regularized sparse coding (EBSPTM) [28], block Sparse Bayesian Learning for Semi-Coupled Dictionary Learning (bSBL-SCDL) [29], and compressed sensing for spatiotemporal fusion (CSSF) [30]. Although these dictionary pair-based methods can predict both the phenological and land-cover changes, the high computational complexity of sparse coding limits their applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was done by introducing a two-layer fusion framework, which first predicted the target image at medium resolution, followed by the desired fine resolution, to tackle the problem of large scale difference between fine and coarse images [7]. In order to tackle the drawback of insufficient prior knowledge for sparse representation such as cluster and joint structural sparsity [16] developed an optimization model for spatio-temporal data fusion using semi-coupled dictionary learning and structural sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%