2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00319-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionally graded calcium phosphate coatings produced by ion beam sputtering/mixing deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, CaP coatings on titanium could be made functionally graded system, in order to provide gradient of bioactivity and good mechanical strength [553,554]. Functionally graded CaP coating can be designed so that the top coated layer can provide CaP such as TCP or ACP for accelerated bone formation, while the layer underneath is a dense HAp layer with lower resorption rate and stronger bonding to the implant’s surface [555,556,557,558,559,560,561]. Some of these coatings can be considered as functionally gradient implants because the decomposition of HAp to TCP leads to BCP formation.…”
Section: Functionally Graded Calcium Phosphatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CaP coatings on titanium could be made functionally graded system, in order to provide gradient of bioactivity and good mechanical strength [553,554]. Functionally graded CaP coating can be designed so that the top coated layer can provide CaP such as TCP or ACP for accelerated bone formation, while the layer underneath is a dense HAp layer with lower resorption rate and stronger bonding to the implant’s surface [555,556,557,558,559,560,561]. Some of these coatings can be considered as functionally gradient implants because the decomposition of HAp to TCP leads to BCP formation.…”
Section: Functionally Graded Calcium Phosphatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since plasma-spraying is a high-temperature and line-of-sight process, there are also some aspects that were not solved yet, such as the deteriorating effect of intense heat on substrates, non-uniformity in coating density, wide range of band strength and the unavoidable limitations when trying to coat implant devices with complex shapes [53][54][55][56]. Other studied approaches have been sputter coating techniques that have been shown to be able to increase the bond strength between the coating and the substrates [57][58][59]. However, the inherent drawbacks are that the deposition and the process itself are very slow, the coatings quite thin, or their cohesion not adequate.…”
Section: Ca-p Coatings: Present Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And preliminary animal tests have shown that there is a faster bone bonding between the implants produced by Ar + beam mixing and N + beam mixing processes than there is with coatings produced by the Ar + beam mixing and the Ar + beam mixing processes . 23 The possible reasons may be, first, that because the mass of N + ion is smaller than that of Ar + ion, the size of nano-crystallites in the coatings produced by Ar + beam mixing and N + beam mixing processes was smaller. Second, the higher Ca-P ratio in the coatings produced by Ar + beam mixing and N + beam mixing processes also contributed to the differences in dissolution rate and intracellular activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%