Functionality and SCORM-compliancy Evaluation of eLearning Tools

Ганчев, Иван; O’Dróma, Máirtín; Andreev, Rumen

doi:10.1109/icalt.2007.149

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Authoring tools should provide functionality of automatic knowledge testing with basic tasks like simple choice, multi choice, filling or assigning exercises. Appropriate templates in professional design should be also delivered [10], [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking of Free Authoring Tools for Multimedia Courses Development

Kosc¹,

Gamcová²,

Stec³

et al. 2011

Acta Electrotechnica Et Informatica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benchmarking of Free Authoring Tools for Multimedia Courses Development

Kosc¹,

Gamcová²,

Stec³

et al. 2011

Acta Electrotechnica Et Informatica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Em [21] apresenta um método de avaliação de ferramentas de aprendizagem para definir a compatibilidade das ferramentas ao padrão SCORM. A pesquisa avaliou 10 ferramentas, dividindo-as em três grupos principais: (a) ferramentas de empacotamento de conteúdo de aprendizagem, (b) ferramentas de autoria e (c) ferramentas de gestão de conteúdo de aprendizagem.…”

Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified

Avaliação de Ferramentas de Autoria Gratuitas para produção de Objetos de Aprendizagem no padrão SCORM

Battistella

Wangenheim

2011

RBIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo Abstract This paper presents the evaluation of a set of six authoring tools for SCORM-conform learningobjects. The tools are validated according to two criteria: usability and effectiveness. Usability is measured through the application of two distinct sets of usability heuristics after the production of a learning object with a predefined content. Utility is measured through the evaluation of the quality of the learning objects produced with each tool through the application of a third, specific, set of heuristics. In order to allow a comparative evaluation of both, the tools and the produced learning objects, a reference learning object was taken, which was previously professionally produced in the context of a large distance learning initiative, and which was then reproduced as faithfully as possible with each of the tools. The authoring tools were previously systematically selected from an universe of 14 free tools.

show abstract

“…In (Ab Hamid et al, 2006) the electronic learning system is evaluated for three main components: the usability evaluation to cover the Graphical User Interface, easy to use, helpfulness and alertness; the fulfillment evaluation to examine the features incorporated in terms of reusability, interoperability, durability and accessibility; and the overall satisfaction. (Ganchev et al, 2007) described some important E-learning tools for evaluation of elearning system. Mainly it was divided into main groups "General Criteria" and "SCORM Compliance Criteria".…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating E-Learning Systems Using E-Traceability Systems

Hammami¹

2010

Journal of Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problem statement: Electronic learning (e-learning) System is an ideal example of these modern learning options. It provides reliable, convenient and easily accessible environment of learning. Since the e-learning is now growing in King Saud University, this new learning approach has to be evaluated and monitored to measure the efficiency and ultimately improves its productivity. The monitoring of the e-learning applications deserves special attention and we need effective methodologies and appropriate guidelines to perform this task. Approach: The development and implementation of an effective and appropriate evaluation approach based on different types of information and analysis of reports offered by an E-Traceability System (ETS) in order to improve and enhance the e-learning system and its performance to make sure it performs its mission as desired. Results: The E-traceability system has been developed, implemented and extensively tested and the evaluation can be done with automatic and easy way. Conclusion: The outcomes of the tests are relevant information delivered by the system concerning any user's actions in a standard reports format represented as graph diagram. These reports are related to the following main evaluation questions are being performed and they pertain to measure the popularity of the e-learning system, engagement of the participants and interactions between them and it can be used in support services and decision making

show abstract

Functionality and SCORM-compliancy Evaluation of eLearning Tools

Cited by 8 publications

References 1 publication

Benchmarking of Free Authoring Tools for Multimedia Courses Development

Benchmarking of Free Authoring Tools for Multimedia Courses Development

Avaliação de Ferramentas de Autoria Gratuitas para produção de Objetos de Aprendizagem no padrão SCORM

Evaluating E-Learning Systems Using E-Traceability Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About