2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10198-011-0033-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking of Free Authoring Tools for Multimedia Courses Development

Abstract: In this article, four free authoring tools have been selected. Following, the selected tools using benchmarking method have been compared. The benchmarking purpose is to show advantages and disadvantages of selected authoring tools and to provide recommendations for users with small experiences in multimedia technologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They, however, did not report whether they had tried to publish it in other browsers, such as Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer, or the latest Microsoft Edge. This was in line with Košč, Gamcová, Štec, and Kocur (2011) suggestion stating that the exported content of CourseLab 2.4 could work well only in Firefox and Microsoft browsers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They, however, did not report whether they had tried to publish it in other browsers, such as Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer, or the latest Microsoft Edge. This was in line with Košč, Gamcová, Štec, and Kocur (2011) suggestion stating that the exported content of CourseLab 2.4 could work well only in Firefox and Microsoft browsers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They, however, reported that they could add unanimated objects such as shapes, link, and even url (uniform resource locator) to their created content easily. This high selfefficacy in working with different types of media in CourseLab 2.4. might due to the program's attribute as a rich-media support software (Khademi, Haghshenas, & Kabir, 2011;Košč, Gamcová, Štec, & Kocur, 2011;Ragasa, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The students were also required to create a quiz at the end of the material they created that functioned as learning feedback for their intended users or, in this case, primary school students. Still in line with what this idea, this assignment was very likely to promote the students" positive perceptions of CourseLab 2.4 as the authoring software also provided them with similar, and hence, familiar environment as they would have when using Microsoft PowerPoint [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It supports different file formats of texts, images, and videos. Further, it also offers rich and intuitive templates for an interactive test or exercise development [12].…”
Section: B Courselab 24mentioning
confidence: 99%