2017
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional response and multiple predator effects of two generalist predators preying on Tuta absoluta eggs

Abstract: At low prey densities, most of the interactions were independent, whereas at high densities most interactions were not independent and resulted in prey risk reduction, indicating antagonism between the individuals involved. We also showed that N. tenuis is a more competitive predator species for T. absoluta eggs than M. pygmaeus; however, combination of the two predator species will lead to better pest suppression at high T. absoluta population densities. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IPM measures included the release of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) in nurseries where it established and successfully controlled the S. American tomato pinworm (Calvo, Lorente, Stansly, & Belda, 2012). N. tenuis could also be used in combination with the predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) in biological control programmes of the tomato pinworm (Michaelides et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IPM measures included the release of the predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) in nurseries where it established and successfully controlled the S. American tomato pinworm (Calvo, Lorente, Stansly, & Belda, 2012). N. tenuis could also be used in combination with the predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) in biological control programmes of the tomato pinworm (Michaelides et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the control of pests principally depends on insecticides (Roditakis et al, ; Wang & Wu, ), the management of pests’ populations should also include preventive and other corrective measures (Naranjo & Ellsworth, ). Such measures should combine pheromone traps, predators, parasitoids, insect pathogens and plant extracts (Abd El‐Ghany, Abdel‐Razek, Ebadah, & Mahmoud, ; Alili, Doumandji, Benrima, Doumandji, & Doumandji, ; Biondi, Desneux, Amiens‐Desneux, Siscaro, & Zappalà, ; Messelink & Janssen, ; Michaelides, Sfenthourakis, Pitsillou, & Seraphides, ; Mollá, González‐Cabrera, & Urbaneja, ; Urbaneja, Montón, & Mollá, ). In addition, an excessive use of insecticides often leads to a reduction of their effectiveness due to survival of resistant genotypes (Perry, Yamamoto, Ishaaya, & Perry, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional response of predators may vary depending on prey size (Aljetlawi et al, 2004), prey evasive behavior (such as movement), or due to the predator's attack stimuli and food satisfaction (Botteon et al, 2016). Our laboratory trials did not provide the same situations that the predator would be exposed to in the field, where many factors may contribute to changes in functional response, such as the generalist predation habit (Schenk & Bacher, 2002), the complexity of the natural environment, intraguild predation and prey limitation (Michaelides et al, 2017), the time to learn the environment and to search for prey (Holling, 1959), temperature conditions (Englund et al, 2011), and structure or chemical compounds of host plants (Malaquias et al, 2014(Malaquias et al, , 2015Jalali & Ziaaddini, 2016). The size of the predator-prey contact arena under laboratory conditions may force the predator to maintain greater or lesser contact with the prey densities provided and increase the probability of obtaining type II responses (Hassanpour et al, 2010;Papanikolaou et al, 2014;van Lenteren et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ingegno et al 2017). Eerdere studies met M. pygmaeus en N. tenuis melden een predatiecapaciteit van respectievelijk 50 en 70 eieren per dag (Michaelides et al 2018). Opvallend was dat het aantal larven dat per dag gegeten wordt een stuk lager ligt, waarschijnlijk omdat het de wantsen meer moeite kosten de prooi te vinden en door het blad heen aan te prikken.…”
Section: 2unclassified