2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional form and interactions of the drivers of understory non‐native plant invasions in northern US forests

Abstract: 1. The number and rate of non-native plant invasions in forests have been steadily increasing over the last century with profound consequences for the composition, structure and functioning of these ecosystems. While multiple regional, landscape and local environmental factors are known to drive the spread of non-native invasive plant species (NNIPS) into forests, such factors have rarely been analysed within a unified analytical framework allowing for the assessment of their relative importance, possible non-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42, therefore the assessment metrics were similar (Table 2); with bias, MAE and RMSE being almost undetectable larger than the back-transformed values. The model currently in used in Romania (Giurgiu and Draghiciu 2004) had not surprisingly all six variables significant (p value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the predicted and original data is superior to the one supplied by Eq.…”
Section: Models Of Dominant Height Of Romanian Norway Sprucementioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…42, therefore the assessment metrics were similar (Table 2); with bias, MAE and RMSE being almost undetectable larger than the back-transformed values. The model currently in used in Romania (Giurgiu and Draghiciu 2004) had not surprisingly all six variables significant (p value < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the predicted and original data is superior to the one supplied by Eq.…”
Section: Models Of Dominant Height Of Romanian Norway Sprucementioning
confidence: 94%
“…42 (Table 2), but the difference is < 1% for all site indices. Regardless of the site index, the bias, MAE, and RMSE were the smallest for Giurgiu and Draghiciu (2004) models (Table 2), but the differences were miniscule (< 1%). If the values predicted by the Giurgiu and Draghiciu (2004) models were infinitesimal superior to the Bayesian and the proposed methods, the situation is completely reversed when the focus is on variance.…”
Section: Models Of Dominant Height Of Romanian Norway Sprucementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations