2018
DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2019.15.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Analysis of SBPase Gene Promoter in Transgenic Wheat under Abiotic Stresses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the different fusion genes, all is similar to the results explained in Mukherjee et al , in which the rubisco small subunit gene promoter was isolated from wheat and hence, drove excellent GUS expression in the green tobacco tissues, beyond roots, conversely, its activity was not studied through various stages of growth ( Mukherjee et al, 2015 ). Moreover, the obtained results agree with Alotaibi et al, 2018 , Alotaibi et al, 2019 ) studies, as the same promoters of both the B. distachyon SBPase and FBPA genes were efficient in facilitating GUS transgene expression in wheat leaves. In conclusion, these two Brachypodium promoters of the SBPase and FBPA enzymes were validated as robust genetic tools of choice in plant genetic engineering towards guiding the expression of the transgenic of interest, specifically in mesophyll cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Taking into account the different fusion genes, all is similar to the results explained in Mukherjee et al , in which the rubisco small subunit gene promoter was isolated from wheat and hence, drove excellent GUS expression in the green tobacco tissues, beyond roots, conversely, its activity was not studied through various stages of growth ( Mukherjee et al, 2015 ). Moreover, the obtained results agree with Alotaibi et al, 2018 , Alotaibi et al, 2019 ) studies, as the same promoters of both the B. distachyon SBPase and FBPA genes were efficient in facilitating GUS transgene expression in wheat leaves. In conclusion, these two Brachypodium promoters of the SBPase and FBPA enzymes were validated as robust genetic tools of choice in plant genetic engineering towards guiding the expression of the transgenic of interest, specifically in mesophyll cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Over the last few decades, agricultural research has adopted technologies, such as genetic engineering and, more recently, 'genome editing' to improve traits in key crops [182][183][184][185][186]. There have been recent advances in the tools available to carry out this work, including vectors for multiple gene insertions [187][188][189][190][191] and tissue-specific promoters [192][193][194][195][196][197]. The generation of parthenocarpic fruit via genetic manipulation brings its own challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural research has adopted key technologies such as genetic engineering and genome editing to improve identifiable traits in crops [30,350,351], and new tools have been developed, including vectors multiple gene insertion [352][353][354][355][356] and tissue-specific promoters [99,[357][358][359][360][361]. However, many countries still have an aversion to the use of these technologies, which are often complicated by non-science-based ideas [362][363][364]; both public perception and governmental bias around these technologies will need to be addressed, and a more streamlined, long-term approach to these technologies will need to be adopted.…”
Section: Future Prospects and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%