IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2014
DOI: 10.1109/jcdl.2014.6970154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From user needs to opportunities in personal information management: A case study on organisational strategies in cross-media information spaces

Abstract: The efficient management of our daily information in physical and digital information spaces is a well-known problem. Current research on personal information management (PIM) aims to understand and improve organisational and re-finding activities. We present a case study about organisational strategies in cross-media information spaces, consisting of physical as well as digital information. In contrast to existing work, we provide a unified view on organisational strategies and investigate how re-finding cues… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Users thus appear to differ widely regarding most FM actions; what they seem to have in common, however, is a lack of reliance on soft file linking features such as aliases in Mac, shortcuts in Windows, and symlinks in Linux (GonQalves & Jorge, 2003;Ravasio et al, 2004). Nonetheless, different approaches or strategies to organizing have been identified among the varied findings, albeit rather broadly, so that we can describe organizers as: neat or messy (Boardman & Sasse, 2004), prone to saving or deleting (Berlin, Jeffries, O'Day, Paepcke, & Wharton, 1993), and prone to filing or piling (Malone, 1983), extensive filing or single folder filing (Henderson & Srinivasan, 2011), or mixing approaches (Trullemans & Signer, 2014a). To draw conclusions beyond these, studies are needed with commensurable contexts, participant characteristics, file system measures, and results reporting (Dinneen, Odoni, Frissen, & Julien, 2016).…”
Section: Understanding User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users thus appear to differ widely regarding most FM actions; what they seem to have in common, however, is a lack of reliance on soft file linking features such as aliases in Mac, shortcuts in Windows, and symlinks in Linux (GonQalves & Jorge, 2003;Ravasio et al, 2004). Nonetheless, different approaches or strategies to organizing have been identified among the varied findings, albeit rather broadly, so that we can describe organizers as: neat or messy (Boardman & Sasse, 2004), prone to saving or deleting (Berlin, Jeffries, O'Day, Paepcke, & Wharton, 1993), and prone to filing or piling (Malone, 1983), extensive filing or single folder filing (Henderson & Srinivasan, 2011), or mixing approaches (Trullemans & Signer, 2014a). To draw conclusions beyond these, studies are needed with commensurable contexts, participant characteristics, file system measures, and results reporting (Dinneen, Odoni, Frissen, & Julien, 2016).…”
Section: Understanding User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Boardman and Sasse (2004, p. 585) conducted a cross-form study and reported that participants organized digital files more extensively than other formats. Trullemans and Signer (2014) also examined both physical and digital information and reported that participants used filing, piling and mixing strategies when…”
Section: Personal Information Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasional filers/extensive filers/total filers (Boardman and Sasse, 2004) Pilers/filers/structurers (Henderson and Srinivasan, 2011) Piling/filing/mixing (Trullemans and Signer, 2014) Rigid categorizer/flexible categorizer/fuzzy categorizer (Oh, 2017) Source: Adopted from Oh (2013)…”
Section: Digital Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardof-Jaffe and Nachmias, 2013; Zhang and Liu, 2015) or on faculty members practices (e.g. Kwasnik, 1991; Trullemans and Signer, 2014), but when studied, these groups are often considered as overall information workers. This lead to a focus on the classification structures produced and factors motivating their creation rather than on the very meaning of their information organization practices with regard to their broader student or professional lives.…”
Section: Personal Information Management Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%