2020
DOI: 10.1108/jd-03-2020-0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organizing personal digital information: an analysis of faculty member activities

Abstract: PurposeThe objective of this paper is to document and analyze the organizational activities of faculty members using a personal information management (PIM) framework developed by Jacques (2016).Design/methodology/approachInterviews were carried out with seven faculty members, focusing on their personal information organization practices as they relate to their academic activities. These interviews took the form of a guided tour of informants' digital workspaces.FindingsAnalyses focused on PIM activities make … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research paints an incomplete picture of how information literacies, information technology affordances and practices, and the workflows of scholars intersect. There are a few studies of ICT tools used by faculty within the research workflow process (Antonijevic andCahoy, 2014, 2018;Antonijevi c, 2015;Zoellner et al, 2015;Sack, 2017;Falciani-White, 2017;Gessner et al, 2017;Nicholas et al, 2017;Cooper and Reiger, 2018;Jacques et al, 2021). These studies indicate the tasks (or steps) involved in the research process, but do not link to scholars' information literacies and practices.…”
Section: Scholarly Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research paints an incomplete picture of how information literacies, information technology affordances and practices, and the workflows of scholars intersect. There are a few studies of ICT tools used by faculty within the research workflow process (Antonijevic andCahoy, 2014, 2018;Antonijevi c, 2015;Zoellner et al, 2015;Sack, 2017;Falciani-White, 2017;Gessner et al, 2017;Nicholas et al, 2017;Cooper and Reiger, 2018;Jacques et al, 2021). These studies indicate the tasks (or steps) involved in the research process, but do not link to scholars' information literacies and practices.…”
Section: Scholarly Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their resultant model consists of six stages: “…initiation, identification, temporary categorization, examination/comparison, selection/modification/creation and categorization” (p. 18). In a recent study, Jacques et al (2020) highlighted four activities that were involved in the organization of personal information by faculty namely inclusion, exclusion, apprehension and implementation. They showed that there were differences in the ability of faculty to analyze their information practices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%