1989
DOI: 10.1075/hl.16.1-2.18noo
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the history of the term ‘exocentric’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the distinction between endocentric and exocentric compounds was known to scholars before Bloomfield and the introduction of this distinction into modern literature should be attributed to Aleksandrov (1888) who argues for a distinction between exocentric and esocentric compounds. 1 Following Aleksandrov, a number of authors such as Brugmann (1906), Brugmann and Delbrück (1906), and Debrunner (1917) have also used this distinction (for more on this issue see Noordegraaf, 1989).…”
Section: Appendicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the distinction between endocentric and exocentric compounds was known to scholars before Bloomfield and the introduction of this distinction into modern literature should be attributed to Aleksandrov (1888) who argues for a distinction between exocentric and esocentric compounds. 1 Following Aleksandrov, a number of authors such as Brugmann (1906), Brugmann and Delbrück (1906), and Debrunner (1917) have also used this distinction (for more on this issue see Noordegraaf, 1989).…”
Section: Appendicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One main difference with much previous work lies in the fact that we do not refer in our classification to the concepts of endocentricity and exocentricity, which have been extensively used since Bloomfield (1933), but actually predate his treatise (see Noordegraaf 1989). In our view, the exocentricity of English and French [NN] N units is secondary to the word-formation process (Dressler 2006: 34 speaks of 'secondary head-hood' for exocentric compounds).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Second, the distinction between endocentric and exocentric compounds was known to scholars before Bloomfield and the introduction of this distinction into modern literature should be attributed to Aleksandrov (1888) who argues for a distinction between exocentric and esocentric compounds. 1 Following Aleksandrov, a number of authors such as Brugmann (1906), Delbrück (1906), andDebrunner (1917) have also used this distinction (for more on this issue see Noordegraaf, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%