2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00338.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Life Cycle Assessment to Life Cycle Management

Abstract: Summary Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a widely accepted methodology to support decision‐making processes in which one compares alternatives, and that helps prevent shifting of environmental burdens along the value chain or among impact categories. According to regulation in the European Union (EU), the movement of waste needs to be reduced and, if unavoidable, the environmental gain from a specific waste treatment option requiring transport must be larger than the losses arising from transport. The EU explici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We examined the program theory of the CCAFS, a key player in science-policy interface related to CSA, which invested USD 414 million from 2011-2016 on AR4D in relation to CSA, we then evaluated how the program theory has performed using case studies, inspired by literature on program theory evaluation and reconstruction [45][46][47], to propose a revised and improved program theory. The CCAFS program theory is in line with what many believe to be good practices for science-policy engagement efforts and is consistent with the literature [13,14,18,[48][49][50][51]. Therefore, any insights into how the program theory works in practice, and revisions which are needed, will not only enable better design of science-policy engagement efforts, but also make an important contribution to the literature on science-policy engagement, where much of the focus has been on conceptual insights, and systematic empirical insights into what works in practice are only emerging.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We examined the program theory of the CCAFS, a key player in science-policy interface related to CSA, which invested USD 414 million from 2011-2016 on AR4D in relation to CSA, we then evaluated how the program theory has performed using case studies, inspired by literature on program theory evaluation and reconstruction [45][46][47], to propose a revised and improved program theory. The CCAFS program theory is in line with what many believe to be good practices for science-policy engagement efforts and is consistent with the literature [13,14,18,[48][49][50][51]. Therefore, any insights into how the program theory works in practice, and revisions which are needed, will not only enable better design of science-policy engagement efforts, but also make an important contribution to the literature on science-policy engagement, where much of the focus has been on conceptual insights, and systematic empirical insights into what works in practice are only emerging.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To go beyond life-cycle thinking, a life-cycle management perspective (Fullana i Palmer et al 2011) indicates that to put this system in place, a new value chain is needed, requiring the different actors to agree on the new market conditions and the development of new logistics. Social barriers such as historical practices by corn farmers would have to be overcome.…”
Section: Discussion On the Green Properties Of The Proposed Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended strategies include specific go-between roles for boundary organizations (15) or decision scientists (4). Emerging principles of "consensus beats reality" and "good enough is best" suggest that stakeholder trust and agreement may be more important to effective evidence-based decision making for wicked problems than high levels of scientific rigor and certainty (15,16).…”
Section: Impact and Capacity Approaches To Adaptation Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%