2016 17th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ichqp.2016.7783309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency response of revenue meters in measured active energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The centre frequency of the first group is 2.1 kHz for a 50 Hz system. The output Y B,b of each band is the rms value calculated according to (1).…”
Section: A Iec Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The centre frequency of the first group is 2.1 kHz for a 50 Hz system. The output Y B,b of each band is the rms value calculated according to (1).…”
Section: A Iec Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the BW error is extremely close to this value around the 2 kHz frequency. 10 2 HF %one frequenc( (kH)) 10 1 10 2 HF %one frequenc( (kH)) Fig. 6.…”
Section: A Single Tonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [21], eight electronic meters for electricity revenue (three single phase and five three-phase) were tested according to the standard EN 50470-3, but extending the frequency range up to 3 kHz. For this test, an Omicron CMC 256+ generator was employed for the voltage and current signals for the meters and an NI 9239 card was used to monitor the pulsed output of the meters.…”
Section: A Performance Tests Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of static electricity meters under non-sinusoidal situations is an important topic for both academic study and public interest [1]. It is not yet properly covered by the standards [2] but has been analyzed from different perspectives [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] during the last few years. However, addressing the problem of erroneous readings on SEMs when exposed to distorted signals is a complex task [10], where a large number of variables could affect the final measurement reported by the meter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%