2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and fitness cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Chrysomela tremulae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Abstract: The 'high dose-refuge' (HDR) strategy is commonly recommended and currently used for delaying or preventing pest adaptation to transgenic plants producing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins. The efficiency of this strategy depends, among other factors, on the initial frequency of Bt resistance alleles and on the fitness costs associated with these alleles. Two years ago, an allele conferring resistance to Bt poplar was detected in a French population of the poplar pest Chrysomela tremulae F. Although this pest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Novel approaches are needed to provide information for the management of resistance to bacterial toxins. The knowledge of the initial frequency of resistance alleles in field populations, particularly for those that are inherited recessively, is essential to establish strategies to delay resistance (14,36,37). In such cases, heterozygous individuals that emerge gradually in the population under selection cannot be identified by bioassays and resistance allele frequency can increase without being detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel approaches are needed to provide information for the management of resistance to bacterial toxins. The knowledge of the initial frequency of resistance alleles in field populations, particularly for those that are inherited recessively, is essential to establish strategies to delay resistance (14,36,37). In such cases, heterozygous individuals that emerge gradually in the population under selection cannot be identified by bioassays and resistance allele frequency can increase without being detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, 1/16 of F 2 larvae will be resistant homozygous (RR genotype) in isofemale lines whose parents had the resistance allele . The F 2 screen method was used to estimate the resistance allele frequency to Bt toxins in several pest species, such as Heliothis virescens (F.) (Gould et al, 1997), Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) (Tabashnik et al, 2000), Diatraea saccharalis (F.) , Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Andow et al, , 2000Bourguet et al, 2003;Stodola et al, 2006;Engels et al, 2010;Siegfried et al, 2014), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Zhao et al, 2002), Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Liu et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2009;Mahon et al, 2010Mahon et al, , 2012, Helicoverpa punctigera (Wallengren) (Mahon et al, 2012) and Crysomela tremulae F. (Wenes et al, 2006). The resistance allele frequency in these studies ranged from 0.0009 to 0.0297.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The 95% confidence interval of the estimated resistance frequency was also calculated as described by Andow and Alstad. 34 The probability that a resistance allele could be identified in a family line was estimated according to the methods described in Stodola and Andow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%