2019
DOI: 10.1080/19496591.2019.1669455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fraternity Chapter Masculine Norm Climates as Predictors of Social Dominance Hazing Motivations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the study is to examine if the sexual assault attitudes of fraternity men vary between chapters and to identify if chapter traditional masculine norm climates predict these attitudes. Because we rely on the same data set, we also examine how the relationships among these climates and attitudes compare and contrast with those of McCready (2019McCready ( , 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of the study is to examine if the sexual assault attitudes of fraternity men vary between chapters and to identify if chapter traditional masculine norm climates predict these attitudes. Because we rely on the same data set, we also examine how the relationships among these climates and attitudes compare and contrast with those of McCready (2019McCready ( , 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistically significant relationships between collective fraternity chapter power over women climate and three of four sexual assault attitudes are also noteworthy because this climate was not found to be associated with members' alcohol consumption or endorsement of hazing in studies that relied on the same data set (McCready, 2019(McCready, , 2020. While patriarchal fraternity chapter cultures may influence members to objectify women and minimize sexual assault in order to earn or maintain their manhood, members may learn that alcohol and hazing are less effective mechanisms to garner this gender status within these settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, research indicates worker gender, individually and collectively (e.g., gendered norms), can affect the risky behaviors of employees (Stergiou-Kita et al, 2015). Further, shared masculine norms in fraternities positively predict certain hazing justifications (McCready, 2019), and it is possible that men are more receptive to the putative bonding effects of hazing (Lodewijkx, van Zomeren, & Syroit, 2005).…”
Section: Model Of Workplace Hazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academia is awash in all manner of suggestions about what might contribute to hazing in one context or another, including groupthink (Nuwer, 2004), masculine norms (McCready, 2019), alcohol consumption (Arnold, 1998), moral disengagement (McCreary, 2012), and poor leadership (Zacharda, 2009). But regardless of their truth value, these and many similar suggestions do not directly predict the existence of hazing ex nihilo .…”
Section: The Potential Evolutionary Origin Of Hazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dışlama, utandırma, yok sayma, takıma kabul etmeme gibi tehditlerle sindirerek tahakkümlerini oluştururlar (Waldron ve Kowalski, 2009;Johnson vd., 2018). Yeni gelenler ise kabul sınamalarına katlanmanın sonucunda eskilerle aralarındaki hiyerarşiyi özümserler ve ideal erkekliği açığa çıkarıp yerlerini sağlamlaştırmaya başlarlar (McCready, 2020).…”
Section: Sonuçunclassified