2004
DOI: 10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragebogen zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: Das zur Erklärung gesundheitlicher Risiken infolge chronischer psychomentaler und sozioemotionaler Arbeitsbelastungen entwickelte Modell beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen ist in verschiedenen, z.T. internationalen epidemiologischen und experimentellen Untersuchungen anhand eines standardisierten Messverfahrens erfolgreich überprüft worden. Erstmals werden hier Ergebnisse der psychometrischen Testung des Messverfahrens an einer für die erwerbstätige Bevölkerung Deutschlands repräsentativen Stich… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, each scale is associated with an elevated risk of poor self-rated health, thus indicating satisfactory criterion validity in terms of this health measure. Our results are in line with earlier Wndings of conWrmatory factor analyses of the original ERI questionnaire (Rödel et al 2004;Siegrist et al 2004). Concerning discriminant validity, our results support previous investigations that found statistically signiWcant diVerences in mean scores of eVort, reward and overcommitment according to gender and gender role orientation (Starke and Niedhammer 2002), age, socio-economic position and occupational group ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, each scale is associated with an elevated risk of poor self-rated health, thus indicating satisfactory criterion validity in terms of this health measure. Our results are in line with earlier Wndings of conWrmatory factor analyses of the original ERI questionnaire (Rödel et al 2004;Siegrist et al 2004). Concerning discriminant validity, our results support previous investigations that found statistically signiWcant diVerences in mean scores of eVort, reward and overcommitment according to gender and gender role orientation (Starke and Niedhammer 2002), age, socio-economic position and occupational group ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…ERI was assessed by the validated German version using the 6-item effort and 11-item reward scale (Rö del et al 2004;Siegrist et al 2004). For both scales, high internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) were demonstrated for the present study sample (effort: a ¼ 0.74; reward: a ¼ 0.82).…”
Section: Psychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Es liegen Erfahrungswerte aus verschiedenen Län-dern und Populationen (u. a. Stadtbusund Straßenbahnfahrer, Krankenpflegekräfte, Verwaltungsangestellte, Lehrer usw.) vor [31,38].…”
Section: Messfahrten -Ablauf Und Eingesetzte Fragebögenunclassified