2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(99)00383-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture toughness and crack growth phenomena of plasma-etched single crystal silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreement provides additional evidence that supports our hypothesis. Estimates of the fracture toughness purely based on the (111) surface energy lead to values of K Ic that are approximately 30% smaller (K Ic 0:76 MPa m p ) [12,29]. Notably, this value does not fall into the range of experimental measurements [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This agreement provides additional evidence that supports our hypothesis. Estimates of the fracture toughness purely based on the (111) surface energy lead to values of K Ic that are approximately 30% smaller (K Ic 0:76 MPa m p ) [12,29]. Notably, this value does not fall into the range of experimental measurements [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, some researchers have estimated fracture toughness on micromachined single-crystalline and polycrystalline silicon specimens. 18,19 All of these methods are invariably time consuming, and so it is difficult to generate significant data for statistical purposes. Apart from the difficulties in measuring valid fracture toughness values, their application as design criteria for microparts is not evident, either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reference to the expected values for the critical stress intensity factor is provided by single crystal silicon [18][19][20][21], which can be as low as 0.82 MPa√m for (111) planes [19], and as high as 1.22 MPa√m according to [18]. More specifically, the critical stress intensity factor of single crystal silicon of (100), (110) and (111) was reported as 0.95 MPa√m, 0.90 MPa√m and 0.83 MPa√m respectively [19].…”
Section: Problem Statement and Scientific Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%