2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2018.2812733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Programming for Communication Systems—Part I: Power Control and Beamforming

Abstract: Fractional programming (FP) refers to a family of optimization problems that involve ratio term(s). This two-part paper explores the use of FP in the design and optimization of communication systems. Part I of this paper focuses on FP theory and on solving continuous problems. The main theoretical contribution is a novel quadratic transform technique for tackling the multiple-ratio concave-convex FP problem-in contrast to conventional FP techniques that mostly can only deal with the single-ratio or the max-min… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
736
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,151 publications
(822 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
736
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of K = 8 UTs are randomly distributed in the cell sector. The pathloss is set as −120 dB for all UTs [48]. The antenna array topology ULA is adopted for the BS and each UT k, with the numbers of antennas being M = 128 and N k = 4(∀k), respectively, and the spacing between antennas is a half wavelength.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of K = 8 UTs are randomly distributed in the cell sector. The pathloss is set as −120 dB for all UTs [48]. The antenna array topology ULA is adopted for the BS and each UT k, with the numbers of antennas being M = 128 and N k = 4(∀k), respectively, and the spacing between antennas is a half wavelength.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It cannot be directly solved by standard convex optimization techniques. Moreover, neither the Dinkelbach's transformation [43] nor the fractional programming technique [44] can be directly applied to solve this problem, since the former cannot deal with objective functions with multiple-ratio terms and the latter is not designed to handle coupling constraints. A feasible approach for problem (8) is the AO-based algorithm, which alternating between power optimization and trajectory optimization, however, no optimality (e.g., to stationary solutions) can be theoretically declared for such an algorithm as has been shown in [3], [45], [46], etc.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, Dinkelbach's algorithm is used to solve F (ℓ) 3 , owing to its advantage of not having additional constraints compared with Charnes-Cooper algorithm [34]. Specifically, F (ℓ) 3 is equivalently solved by a series of concave subproblems in the following…”
Section: B Optimal Power Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the parametric problem in (17) required to be addressed in each iteration is concave, thereby, it can be handled by applying classical convex optimization approaches [35]. Moreover, it can be readily proved that the Dinkelbach-based method can converge to the globally optimal solution of the fractional problem F (ℓ) 3 [34]. We can conclude that the sequence of the objective values generated by F (ℓ) 3 converges, which follows from the convergence properties of MM method [33].…”
Section: B Optimal Power Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%