2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four years of DNA barcoding: Current advances and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
203
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
2
203
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the CO1 region has also been widely used to firmly establish the core barcode region for animals (Frezal and Leblois, 2008), and its performance for classification and identification have been evaluated in birds from several regions, including North America (Kerr et al, 2007), Brazil (Chaves et al, 2008), Argentina (Kerr et al, 2009b), Korea (Yoo et al, 2006), and the eastern Palearctic (Kerr et al, 2009a). Although our samples were not collected within breeding habitat, our results did not suggest a relationship between the sequence differences within species and the geographic distances between specimen collection points, as found by Yoo et al (2006) and Hebert et al (2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the CO1 region has also been widely used to firmly establish the core barcode region for animals (Frezal and Leblois, 2008), and its performance for classification and identification have been evaluated in birds from several regions, including North America (Kerr et al, 2007), Brazil (Chaves et al, 2008), Argentina (Kerr et al, 2009b), Korea (Yoo et al, 2006), and the eastern Palearctic (Kerr et al, 2009a). Although our samples were not collected within breeding habitat, our results did not suggest a relationship between the sequence differences within species and the geographic distances between specimen collection points, as found by Yoo et al (2006) and Hebert et al (2003a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides rapid and accurate species identification (with potential for automation) by using short, standardized gene regions as internal species tags (Hebert et al 2003a). Among other things, it may be used to determine taxonomic placement if an organism is damaged, if only fragments remain, or if morphology is insufficient to discriminate between species (Frézal and Leblois 2008). For animals, a part *Corresponding author: bjorn.arne.rukke@fhi.no of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene has been chosen as the official DNA barcoding region in the International Barcode of Life initiative (Hebert et al 2003b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many examples have shown that the COI is reliable for accurate species identification, some studies revealed that a unique region of mitochondrial DNA does not supply ample resolution and could be misleading (Linares et al 2009;Derocles et al 2011). For this reason, a nuclear gene is sometimes required to improve species identification and may also serve as a validating tool during the implementation of the database (Fre´zal & Leblois 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%