2011
DOI: 10.4238/2011.december.21.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing the utility of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 sequences for phylogenetic estimates of relationships between crane (Grus) species

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Morphology and biogeography are widely used in animal taxonomy. Recent study has suggested that a DNA-based identification system, using a 648-bp portion of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (CO1), also known as the barcoding gene, can aid in the resolution of inferences concerning phylogenetic relationships and for identification of species. However, the effectiveness of DNA barcoding for identifying crane species is unknown. We amplified and sequenced 894-bp DNA fragments of CO1 f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accipitriformes (eagles, hawks, kites, harriers, and Old World vultures) were distinguished from Falconiformes (falcons), following Hackett et al (2008). Members of the Gruidae (cranes) formerly assigned to Bugeranus (B. carunculatus) and Anthropoides (A. virgo and A. paradisea) were placed within the Grus genus following Yu et al (2011). Fossils were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Classifications and Osteological Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accipitriformes (eagles, hawks, kites, harriers, and Old World vultures) were distinguished from Falconiformes (falcons), following Hackett et al (2008). Members of the Gruidae (cranes) formerly assigned to Bugeranus (B. carunculatus) and Anthropoides (A. virgo and A. paradisea) were placed within the Grus genus following Yu et al (2011). Fossils were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Classifications and Osteological Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%