Foundations and Implications of a Proposed Unified Services Theory

Abstract

Diverse businesses, such as garbage collection, retail banking, and management consulting are often tied together under the heading of "services", based on little more than a perception that they are intangible and do not manufacture anything. Such definitions inadequately identify managerial and operational implications common among, and unique to, services. We present a "Unified Services Theory" (UST) to clearly delineate service processes from non-service processes and to identify key commonalities across seemingly disparate service businesses. The UST defines a service production process as one that relies on customer inputs; customers act as suppliers for all service processes. Non-services (such as make-to-stock manufacturing) rely on customer selection of outputs, payment for outputs, and occasional feedback, but production is not dependent upon inputs from individual customers. The UST reveals principles that are common to the wide range of services and provides a unifying foundation for various theories and models of service operations, such as the traditional "characteristics of services" and Customer Contact Theory. The UST has significant operational corollaries pertaining to capacity and demand management, service quality, services strategy, and so forth. The UST provides a common reference point to which services management researchers can anchor future theory-building and theory-testing research.

Value-Based and Context-Aware Selection of Software-Service Bundles: A Capability Based Method

“…Existing work tries to understand service processes from three overall perspectives: input, transformation process and outcome [35]. In contrast to manufacturing-based production processes, also customers provide significant input in service processes [36]. This is clearly visible in our product-service bundle.…”

Process design principles in service firms: Universal or context dependent? A literature review and new research directions

“…Second, Sampson and Froehle (2006) state that process design is directly related to the customer inputs supplied to the service delivery process. This perspective emphasises the importance of customer involvement in the service delivery process as the key difference between goods production operations and service provision.…”

Towards a Service System Ontology for Service Science

“…They can offer themselves, their property or information as input. The unique contribution of this theory is in defining the concept of customer input [18].…”

“…A service is perceived as a process that consists of (at least one) interactions between customer and provider. Furthermore, the theory introduces the concept customer resources which include customer-self inputs, tangible belongings and customer-provided information [18]. According to UST a service is a production process in which the customer provides at least one resource that is an essential input for the production of the service.…”